Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025
Impact of Environmental Quality on Pancreatic Cancer Outcomes Post Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Khalid Abdullah, Aveson Victoria, Pasha Shamsher A, Demyan Lyudmyla, Standring Oliver, Newman Elliot, King Daniel A, DePeralta Danielle, Gholami Sepideh, Weiss Matthew J, Melis Marcovalerio
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The Environmental Quality Index (EQI), a composite measure of county-level environmental burden, has been linked to cancer incidence and disease progression. We evaluated the association between EQI and clinical characteristics and outcomes among patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of PDAC patients who underwent PD between 2014 and 2023. Patients were stratified into low, moderate, or high EQI groups. Multinomial regression models were used to assess associations between EQI levels and clinical variables, using the low EQI group as the reference.
RESULTS: Among the 137 patients with PDAC who underwent PD, 37 (27.1%) were in the low, 42 (30.6%) in the moderate, and 58 (42.3%) in the high EQI groups. The study identified significant associations in high EQI groups: race (minority vs. white patients: RR 2.44, p = 0.044); diabetes mellitus prevalence (RR 3.12, 95% CI 1.30-7.49, p = 0.011), tumor size > 5 cm (RR 1.53, p = 0.048), history of other types of cancer (RR 1.64, p = 0.038), longer time-to-treatment (RR 1.96, p = 0.041), and ICU stay > 3 days (RR 1.95, p = 0.013), compared to the low EQI group. No significant differences were observed in severe post-operative complications, mortality rates, or median overall survival across groups (mOS: 20.2 months for low, 15.2 months for moderate, and 14.2 months for high EQI, respectively, p = 0.210).
CONCLUSION: Patients residing in areas with poor environmental quality had higher comorbidity burden and delays in treatment, though EQI was not significantly associated with surgical or survival outcomes.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of PDAC patients who underwent PD between 2014 and 2023. Patients were stratified into low, moderate, or high EQI groups. Multinomial regression models were used to assess associations between EQI levels and clinical variables, using the low EQI group as the reference.
RESULTS: Among the 137 patients with PDAC who underwent PD, 37 (27.1%) were in the low, 42 (30.6%) in the moderate, and 58 (42.3%) in the high EQI groups. The study identified significant associations in high EQI groups: race (minority vs. white patients: RR 2.44, p = 0.044); diabetes mellitus prevalence (RR 3.12, 95% CI 1.30-7.49, p = 0.011), tumor size > 5 cm (RR 1.53, p = 0.048), history of other types of cancer (RR 1.64, p = 0.038), longer time-to-treatment (RR 1.96, p = 0.041), and ICU stay > 3 days (RR 1.95, p = 0.013), compared to the low EQI group. No significant differences were observed in severe post-operative complications, mortality rates, or median overall survival across groups (mOS: 20.2 months for low, 15.2 months for moderate, and 14.2 months for high EQI, respectively, p = 0.210).
CONCLUSION: Patients residing in areas with poor environmental quality had higher comorbidity burden and delays in treatment, though EQI was not significantly associated with surgical or survival outcomes.