Patient education and counseling · 2008
Have you had a tetanus booster in the last 10 years? Sensitivity and specificity of the question.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hagen Philip T, Bond Allison R, Rehman Hamid, Molella Robin G, Murad M Hassan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of patients' recall of their last Tetanus/Diphtheria (Td) booster in the setting of employee health clinics known for high immunization rates and good documentation of vaccine status.
METHODS: Five hundred and seventy-two patients of an employee health clinic answered a written questionnaire about whether they have had a Td booster in the last 10 years. Answers were compared with patients' charts as the gold standard.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of the question is 92.4% (95% CI 89.0-95.0) and specificity is 26.5% (95% CI 12.9-44.4). Positive predictive value is 92.6% (95% CI 89.3-95.2) and negative predictive value is 25.7% (95% CI 12.5-43.3). Age and gender do not affect the accuracy of recall.
CONCLUSION: A positive answer to this question is highly reliable whereas a negative answer is unreliable.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: In the setting of employee health clinics, when patients affirm the receipt of a Td booster within the previous 10 years, it is quite likely that they are up to date and do not require re-administration of the vaccine. Any other answer to this question (No, I do not know) is unreliable and a booster should be recommended if not contraindicated.
METHODS: Five hundred and seventy-two patients of an employee health clinic answered a written questionnaire about whether they have had a Td booster in the last 10 years. Answers were compared with patients' charts as the gold standard.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of the question is 92.4% (95% CI 89.0-95.0) and specificity is 26.5% (95% CI 12.9-44.4). Positive predictive value is 92.6% (95% CI 89.3-95.2) and negative predictive value is 25.7% (95% CI 12.5-43.3). Age and gender do not affect the accuracy of recall.
CONCLUSION: A positive answer to this question is highly reliable whereas a negative answer is unreliable.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: In the setting of employee health clinics, when patients affirm the receipt of a Td booster within the previous 10 years, it is quite likely that they are up to date and do not require re-administration of the vaccine. Any other answer to this question (No, I do not know) is unreliable and a booster should be recommended if not contraindicated.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Age FactorsAttitude to HealthDiphtheria-Tetanus VaccineFemaleHealth SurveysHumansImmunization, SecondaryMaleMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedMental RecallMiddle AgedMinnesotaOccupational Health ServicesRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySex FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsVaccination