Australian and New Zealand journal of public health · 1999
Barriers to immunisation in general practice.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bailey H D, Kurinczuk J J, Kusel M M, Plant A J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To identify barriers to immunisation in general practice.
METHOD: The study was conducted in Perth, Western Australia, as a cross-sectional postal survey between November 1996 and January 1997. Questionnaires were sent to all known GPs in three of the seven metropolitan Divisions of General Practice, of whom 301 (72%) responded.
RESULTS: When a child presented with a minor illness and there were no contraindications to immunisation, 62% of GPs said they would always or frequently offer immunisation. Immunisation would be withheld incorrectly because of an upper respiratory tract infection by 43% of GPs and because of antibiotics by 50%. Combined diphtheria-tetanus vaccine (CDT) would be substituted incorrectly for diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine (DTP) by 41% if there was an unexplained temperature of 38 degrees C following a previous dose of DTP. While more than half (56%) reported that vaccines were correctly stored, only 26% reported that the refrigerator temperature was checked daily. Eighty per cent reported that they completed an Australian Childhood Immunisation Register notification form.
CONCLUSIONS: GPs require ongoing education about contra-indications to immunisation and when substitution of CDT for DTP is required. There is room for increased opportunistic immunisation and encouragement to notify the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register when they immunise a child.
IMPLICATIONS: A major challenge is to find an innovative approach that would encourage and enable GPs to assess immunisation status and offer immunisation where appropriate at every clinical encounter.
METHOD: The study was conducted in Perth, Western Australia, as a cross-sectional postal survey between November 1996 and January 1997. Questionnaires were sent to all known GPs in three of the seven metropolitan Divisions of General Practice, of whom 301 (72%) responded.
RESULTS: When a child presented with a minor illness and there were no contraindications to immunisation, 62% of GPs said they would always or frequently offer immunisation. Immunisation would be withheld incorrectly because of an upper respiratory tract infection by 43% of GPs and because of antibiotics by 50%. Combined diphtheria-tetanus vaccine (CDT) would be substituted incorrectly for diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine (DTP) by 41% if there was an unexplained temperature of 38 degrees C following a previous dose of DTP. While more than half (56%) reported that vaccines were correctly stored, only 26% reported that the refrigerator temperature was checked daily. Eighty per cent reported that they completed an Australian Childhood Immunisation Register notification form.
CONCLUSIONS: GPs require ongoing education about contra-indications to immunisation and when substitution of CDT for DTP is required. There is room for increased opportunistic immunisation and encouragement to notify the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register when they immunise a child.
IMPLICATIONS: A major challenge is to find an innovative approach that would encourage and enable GPs to assess immunisation status and offer immunisation where appropriate at every clinical encounter.