Medicina clinica · 2005
[Immunity to diphtheria among adults older than 65 years].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Velarde-Mayol Cristina, Gómez de Caso Jose Angel, Gil de Miguel Angel
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To know the immune state against diphtheria through a survey, a consultation of the vaccination documents and a seroepidemiologic study of an old population.
PATIENTS AND METHOD: The immunization status and the prevalence of antidiphtheria antibodies were determined in a representative sample (n = 231) of this population group (> 65 years). Concentrations of toxin antibodies were measured using a commercial ELISA kit. Samples with titres > 0.1 UI/ml were considered protective.
RESULTS: In the vaccination documents we only found 19 old individuals vaccinated against tetanus-diphtheria. 47.1% had no protective titres. Geometric mean titres were 0.12 UI/ml. There was no statistically significant difference between the variables age and sex and the prevalence of antibodies. 84.4% of the 122 seropositives did not report having received diphtheria vaccine and neither had documents about the vaccination.
CONCLUSION: There were almost no documents about diphtheria vaccination. Therefore, the serologic study is the only reliable way to know the immunity status against diphtheria in elderly people. Approximately 50% of this population need primary immunization. The rest of this group need to have completed antidiphtheria vaccination or a dose booster within a period of 2 years in order to guarantee protective antibody levels against diphtheria.
PATIENTS AND METHOD: The immunization status and the prevalence of antidiphtheria antibodies were determined in a representative sample (n = 231) of this population group (> 65 years). Concentrations of toxin antibodies were measured using a commercial ELISA kit. Samples with titres > 0.1 UI/ml were considered protective.
RESULTS: In the vaccination documents we only found 19 old individuals vaccinated against tetanus-diphtheria. 47.1% had no protective titres. Geometric mean titres were 0.12 UI/ml. There was no statistically significant difference between the variables age and sex and the prevalence of antibodies. 84.4% of the 122 seropositives did not report having received diphtheria vaccine and neither had documents about the vaccination.
CONCLUSION: There were almost no documents about diphtheria vaccination. Therefore, the serologic study is the only reliable way to know the immunity status against diphtheria in elderly people. Approximately 50% of this population need primary immunization. The rest of this group need to have completed antidiphtheria vaccination or a dose booster within a period of 2 years in order to guarantee protective antibody levels against diphtheria.