Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2023
Replacing Plain Radiograph with ultra-low dose CT thorax in cystic fibrosis (CF) in the era of CFTR modulation and its impact on cumulative effective dose.
Наблюдательное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sheahan Kevin P, O'Mahony Alexander T, Morrissy David, Ibrahim Hisham, Crowley Claire, Waldron Michael G, Sokol-Randell Darek, McMahon Aisling, Maher Michael M, O'Connor Owen J, Plant Barry J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Medical radiation exposure is of increasing concern in patients with cystic fibrosis (PWCF) due to improving life expectancy. We aimed to assess and quantify the cumulative effective dose (CED) in PWCF in the context of CFTR-modulator therapy and the advancement of dose reduction techniques.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study in a single University CF centre over a 11-year period. We included PWCF, aged over 18 years who exclusively attended our institution. Relevant clinical data (demographics, transplantation history and modulator status) and radiological data (modality, quantity, and radiation exposure measured as CED) were collected. For those on modulator therapy the quantified imaging and radiation data was dichotomised into pre-and-post therapy periods.
RESULTS: The study included 181 patients: 139 on CFTR modulator therapy, 15 transplant recipients and 27 with neither exposure. 82% of patients received <25 mSv over the study period. Mean study duration was 6.9 ± 2.6 years pre-modulation and 4.2 ± 2.6 years post-modulation. Pre-modulation CT contributed 9.6% of total chest imaging (n = 139/1453) and 70.9% of the total CED. Post-modulation CT use increased contributing 42.7% of chest imaging (n = 444/1039) and comprised 75.8% of CED. Annual CED was 1.55 mSv pre and 1.36 mSv post modulation (p = 0.41). Transplant recipients had an annual CED of 64 ± 36.1mSv.
CONCLUSION: Chest CT utilisation for PWCF is rising in our institution, replacing chest radiography amidst CFTR-modulation. Despite the increasing use of CT, no significant radiation dose penalty was observed with a reduction in mean annual CED, primarily due to the influence of CT dose reduction strategies.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study in a single University CF centre over a 11-year period. We included PWCF, aged over 18 years who exclusively attended our institution. Relevant clinical data (demographics, transplantation history and modulator status) and radiological data (modality, quantity, and radiation exposure measured as CED) were collected. For those on modulator therapy the quantified imaging and radiation data was dichotomised into pre-and-post therapy periods.
RESULTS: The study included 181 patients: 139 on CFTR modulator therapy, 15 transplant recipients and 27 with neither exposure. 82% of patients received <25 mSv over the study period. Mean study duration was 6.9 ± 2.6 years pre-modulation and 4.2 ± 2.6 years post-modulation. Pre-modulation CT contributed 9.6% of total chest imaging (n = 139/1453) and 70.9% of the total CED. Post-modulation CT use increased contributing 42.7% of chest imaging (n = 444/1039) and comprised 75.8% of CED. Annual CED was 1.55 mSv pre and 1.36 mSv post modulation (p = 0.41). Transplant recipients had an annual CED of 64 ± 36.1mSv.
CONCLUSION: Chest CT utilisation for PWCF is rising in our institution, replacing chest radiography amidst CFTR-modulation. Despite the increasing use of CT, no significant radiation dose penalty was observed with a reduction in mean annual CED, primarily due to the influence of CT dose reduction strategies.