DOI 10.1016/j.ijpp.2022.06.001
Intestinal parasite infection in the Augustinian friars and general population of medieval Cambridge, UK.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To investigate how lifestyle may have impacted the risk of contracting intestinal parasites in medieval England . Regular clergy (such as those living in monasteries) and the lay population form interesting groups for comparison as diet and lifestyle varied significantly. Monasteries were built with latrine blocks and hand washing facilities, unlike houses of the poor.
MATERIALS: Sediment samples from the pelvis, along with control samples from feet and skull, of 19 burials of Augustinian Friars (13th-16th century), and 25 burials from All Saints by the Castle parish cemetery (10th-14th century), Cambridge.
METHODS
We analysed the sediment using micro-sieving and digital light microscopy to identify the eggs of intestinal parasites.
RESULTS
Parasite prevalence (roundworm and whipworm) in the Augustinian friars was 58%, and in the All Saints by the Castle parishioners just 32% (Barnards Test score statistic 1.7176, p-value 0.092).
CONCLUSIONS
It is interesting that the friars had nearly double the infection rate of parasites spread by poor hygiene, compared with the general population. We consider options that might explain this difference, and discuss descriptions and treatment of intestinal worms in medical texts circulating in Cambridge during the medieval period.
SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first study to compare prevalence of parasite infection between groups with different socioeconomic status from the same location.
LIMITATIONS: Quality of egg preservation was suboptimal, so our data may under-represent the true prevalence.
SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH: Larger studies with greater statistical power, covering different time periods and regions.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.