Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology · 2021
Long term outcomes of sporadic large fundic gland polyps: a single-center experience.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mohammed Abdul, Garg Rajat, Trakroo Sushrut, Singh Amandeep, Sanaka Madhusudhan R
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Sporadic fundic gland polyps (FGP) are the most common type of gastric polyp, reported in 0.8%-1.9% of patients undergoing Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Data on long-term outcomes of large FGP is limited. We aim to study the natural history of sporadic large (≥ 10 mm) FGPs.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: All adults who underwent EGD for any indication from April 2014 to December 2019 at a tertiary care center were retrospectively assessed, and patients with FGP (≥10mm) were identified. Data on baseline characteristics and long-term outcomes were recorded. Follow-up data were recorded for patients who underwent repeat endoscopy to evaluate for rates of dysplasia and cancer.
RESULTS: A total of 4,000 patients with a diagnosis of FGP were screened and 132 large, biopsy-proven FGPs were included in the final analysis. The most common indication for EGD was gastroesophageal reflux disease (61%). During a follow-up period of 3.2 years, the rate of dysplasia, was 4.0%. Subgroup analysis based on size (10-19 mm and ≥ 20 mm) showed no significant difference in overall outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Repeat EGDs for surveillance should not be routinely performed since large (≥10 mm) sporadic FGPs are mostly benign without significant malignant potential.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: All adults who underwent EGD for any indication from April 2014 to December 2019 at a tertiary care center were retrospectively assessed, and patients with FGP (≥10mm) were identified. Data on baseline characteristics and long-term outcomes were recorded. Follow-up data were recorded for patients who underwent repeat endoscopy to evaluate for rates of dysplasia and cancer.
RESULTS: A total of 4,000 patients with a diagnosis of FGP were screened and 132 large, biopsy-proven FGPs were included in the final analysis. The most common indication for EGD was gastroesophageal reflux disease (61%). During a follow-up period of 3.2 years, the rate of dysplasia, was 4.0%. Subgroup analysis based on size (10-19 mm and ≥ 20 mm) showed no significant difference in overall outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Repeat EGDs for surveillance should not be routinely performed since large (≥10 mm) sporadic FGPs are mostly benign without significant malignant potential.