Human pathology · 2024
Superficial dedifferentiated liposarcoma: A clinicopathologic study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bourgeau Melanie, Gandhi Jatin S, Deeb Kristin K, Bahrami Armita
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Dedifferentiation occurs in approximately 10% of atypical lipomatous tumors/well-differentiated liposarcomas (ALT/WDLPS), primarily in retroperitoneal or deep-seated tumors, conferring metastatic potential. Superficial dedifferentiated liposarcoma (sDDLPS) is rare, and its progression and natural history are poorly documented.
METHODS: We performed a 15-year retrospective review of our pathology database to identify cases of DDLPS in the skin or subcutaneous tissue. Diagnosis of primary sDDLPS required evidence of non-lipogenic sarcoma in the skin or subcutis, with concurrent ALT/WDLPS and/or MDM2 amplification.
RESULTS: We identified 14 cases of DDLPS involving skin or subcutis: 7 primary sDDLPS and 7 secondary lesions (3 from recurrent deep DDLPS and 4 from metastasis). Primary sDDLPS cases (4 females, 3 males; median age: 74) mainly presented as undifferentiated spindle cell or pleomorphic sarcoma. Tumor grades were grade 2 (5 cases) and grade 3 (2 cases), with three cases also showing grade 1 areas. MDM2 amplification was confirmed in 6 sDDLPSs for which FISH was successfully performed. Follow-up available for 6 sDDLPS patients showed 2 local recurrences, treated with re-excision and radiation therapy, with all disease-free at last follow-up (5-126 months). Of the 7 secondary cases, 2 had ongoing disease after multiple recurrences, 1 was disease-free, and all 4 with cutaneous metastasis died of disease (follow-up range: 24-263 months).
CONCLUSION: These findings emphasize the importance of distinguishing between primary sDDLPS and secondary lesions due to their distinct prognoses. Metastasis or superficial extensions from deep DDLP correlate with a considerably worse prognosis than those originating in superficial tissues.
METHODS: We performed a 15-year retrospective review of our pathology database to identify cases of DDLPS in the skin or subcutaneous tissue. Diagnosis of primary sDDLPS required evidence of non-lipogenic sarcoma in the skin or subcutis, with concurrent ALT/WDLPS and/or MDM2 amplification.
RESULTS: We identified 14 cases of DDLPS involving skin or subcutis: 7 primary sDDLPS and 7 secondary lesions (3 from recurrent deep DDLPS and 4 from metastasis). Primary sDDLPS cases (4 females, 3 males; median age: 74) mainly presented as undifferentiated spindle cell or pleomorphic sarcoma. Tumor grades were grade 2 (5 cases) and grade 3 (2 cases), with three cases also showing grade 1 areas. MDM2 amplification was confirmed in 6 sDDLPSs for which FISH was successfully performed. Follow-up available for 6 sDDLPS patients showed 2 local recurrences, treated with re-excision and radiation therapy, with all disease-free at last follow-up (5-126 months). Of the 7 secondary cases, 2 had ongoing disease after multiple recurrences, 1 was disease-free, and all 4 with cutaneous metastasis died of disease (follow-up range: 24-263 months).
CONCLUSION: These findings emphasize the importance of distinguishing between primary sDDLPS and secondary lesions due to their distinct prognoses. Metastasis or superficial extensions from deep DDLP correlate with a considerably worse prognosis than those originating in superficial tissues.