[Identify the risk foot in patients with diabetes. A space for improvement in primary care].

GOALS: Identify conditioning factors of the foot risk (FR) by comparing two evaluation methods (qualitative and quantitative) for neuropathy, arteriopathy, foot deformities. Concordance between detected the alterations and registered in clinical history (CH).

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

It is an observational study. Ambit: in two primary care centers of the Catalan Health Institute.

POPULATION: Five hundred thirty-two patients with diabetes, both >18 years with FR records and informed consent.

MEASUREMENTS: Neuropathy: symptom assessment (NSS) and signs of disability (NDS). Arteriopathy: Index ABI. Edinburgh Questionnaire, fart pulses. Foot deformities: Pedigraphy. Quantitative reference: Values Defined neuropathy: NDS>6 points or 3-5 and NSS>5 points. ITB: Normal value (.90-1.30).

RESULTS

Women, 46.42%. Middle ages, 67.29 years (SD 7.69). One hundred fifty-three patients did not present neurovascular alterations.

QUALITATIVE: Without differentiating clinical manifestations: 252, patients presented neuropathy; 99, altered ITB; 28, two complications and 101, Edinburgh Quiz: altered.

QUANTITATIVE: Differentiating clinical manifestations: among the neuropathy group; 110, patients only presented symptoms; 46, definite neuropathy. In 96, NDS and NSS scores without defined neuropathy criteria.

ALTERED ABI: 52, only ABI>1.30; 47, ABI<.90; 12, associated neuropathy and ABI>1.30 and 16, with ABI<.90. Edinburgh questionnaire: 47, presented atypical symptoms and 26, typical. Agreement, between quantitative and recorded neurovascular alterations r=.32 for neuropathy and r=.21 in arteriopathy. The pressure point on the 5th metatarsal, was associated with quantitative neuropathy: OR: 2.32 (1.188-4.546), P=.01.

CONCLUSION

The evaluation, identifying clinical manifestations, improves the identification of FR, although we need more research.