MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/cid/cir006

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2011

Alternative immunological markers to document successful multiple smallpox revaccinations.

Wiser Itay, Orr Nadav, Smetana Zehava, Spungin-Bialik Ania, Mendelson Ella, Cohen Daniel

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Successful smallpox vaccination is traditionally defined by clinical response ("take"). Nevertheless, only 60% of subjects in the 2002 Israeli smallpox revaccination campaign developed clinical take. More sensitive immunological markers are needed to document successful revaccination. We compared the level of vaccinia-specific immune markers among subjects who did or did not develop clinical take following revaccination.

METHODS

Forty subjects who participated in 2002 smallpox revaccination campaign and developed clinical take were individually matched for age, sex, and smallpox vaccinations with subjects who did not develop clinical take ("no-take"). Vaccinia immunity markers were examined prior to and 14 days and 2 years after revaccination.

RESULTS

Higher levels of total immunoglobulin (Ig) G, IgG1, and neutralizing antibodies (highest dilution of serum that inhibited the cytopathic effect by at least 50% [PRNT50]) were observed in the no-take group before vaccination (166 vs 94.3 ELISAU/mL [P<.05], 53.2 vs 34.5 ELISAU/mL [ P<.05], and 30% vs 19.7% [P<.05], respectively). The mean time since last smallpox vaccination was longer in the take group than in the no-take group. Total IgG, IgG subclasses, avidity index, and PRNT50 levels were higher among "take" than "no-take" volunteers 14 days after revaccination. The no-take group was not inferior to the take group in all vaccinia immune marker levels measured 24 months after vaccination. Moreover, mean interferon-γ secretion and the percentage of serum samples with PRNT50 levels ≥1:32 were significantly higher in the No-take group than in the take group (677.5 vs 282.7 pg/mL [P < .05] and 95% vs 80% [P<.05], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The overwhelming majority of subjects in the no-take group were successfully revaccinated against smallpox. Under circumstances of emergent smallpox mass immunization, there is no need for revaccination success assessment among individuals who have received multiple previous smallpox vaccinations.

Для цитирования: Wiser Itay, Orr Nadav, Smetana Zehava, Spungin-Bialik Ania, Mendelson Ella, Cohen Daniel. Alternative immunological markers to document successful multiple smallpox revaccinations.. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2011. DOI: 10.1093/cid/cir006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.