Urology · 2025
Use of the Pediatric Cystoscope for Adult Ureteroscopy.
СтатьяОбзорИсторическая статьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Thomas Hannah S, Lin Lauren, Stern Noah, Herschorn Sender
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To reintroduce the versatility of the pediatric cystoscope, we aimed to synthesize the origins of ureteroscopy and outline our experience utilizing the instrument for the diagnosis and treatment of ureteral pathology.
METHODS: We reviewed published literature for historical and modern-day uses of the pediatric cystoscope for ureteroscopy. In addition, we described our experience maneuvering the scope in common patient scenarios and use this to discuss the pros and cons of this tool for ureteroscopy.
RESULTS: In the 1970s, the pediatric cystoscope gave rise to diagnostic and therapeutic ureteroscopy as documented by historical case series. With the advent of longer and flexible ureteroscopy instruments, the pediatric cystoscope became seemingly less valuable for this procedure. However, as described using multiple case examples, the pediatric cystoscope can be a useful instrument for the investigation and treatment of distal ureteral pathology including 1-2cm tumors, strictures, and stones. This is primarily due to the tool's ergonomic advantage, tolerability under local anesthesia and manipulation into small spaces.
CONCLUSION: Reviewing the historical origins of ureteroscopy reintroduces the urology community to the value of the pediatric cystoscope for the diagnosis and treatment of distal ureteral pathology, particularly in women. The pediatric cystoscope can be a useful instrument for all urologists' armamentarium.
METHODS: We reviewed published literature for historical and modern-day uses of the pediatric cystoscope for ureteroscopy. In addition, we described our experience maneuvering the scope in common patient scenarios and use this to discuss the pros and cons of this tool for ureteroscopy.
RESULTS: In the 1970s, the pediatric cystoscope gave rise to diagnostic and therapeutic ureteroscopy as documented by historical case series. With the advent of longer and flexible ureteroscopy instruments, the pediatric cystoscope became seemingly less valuable for this procedure. However, as described using multiple case examples, the pediatric cystoscope can be a useful instrument for the investigation and treatment of distal ureteral pathology including 1-2cm tumors, strictures, and stones. This is primarily due to the tool's ergonomic advantage, tolerability under local anesthesia and manipulation into small spaces.
CONCLUSION: Reviewing the historical origins of ureteroscopy reintroduces the urology community to the value of the pediatric cystoscope for the diagnosis and treatment of distal ureteral pathology, particularly in women. The pediatric cystoscope can be a useful instrument for all urologists' armamentarium.