Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine · 2026
Comparative study of synthetic nanofilaments assembled from amphiphilic peptides and β-peptides as antigen delivery nanostructures.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tshibwabwa Laetitia Mwadi, Nguyen Phuong Trang, Bourgault Steve
Аннотация
Synthetic peptide vaccines have a high safety profile, although their low immunogenicity requires the use of potent adjuvants and delivery systems. Self-assembling β-peptides and amphiphilic peptides have been identified as versatile building blocks for the preparation of immunostimulating nanocarriers instead of whole protein carrier to display epitopes. However, a direct comparison of the intrinsic immunogenicity of cross-β-sheet nanofilaments and peptide-amphiphile nanofibrils has never been performed. In this study, the amphiphilic peptide C16-V3A3K3 (PA) and the 10-mer self-assembling β-peptide I10 were respectively conjugated with two MHC-peptide epitope models, OVA253-266 and OVA323-339, able to polarize the adaptive immune response differently. Synthetic chimeric peptides self-assembled into cytocompatible nanofilaments that induced a robust antigen-specific IgG antibody response in mice, without the need of any additional adjuvants. The profile of IgG subtypes and the cellular immune response offered preliminary indications that PA induced a balanced Th1/Th2 immune response, whereas I10 exhibited a Th1-polarized pro-inflammatory response.