Efficacy of Aspiration-Assisted Ureteral Access Sheath (ClearPETRA) in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.

Backgrounds: In the renal intrarenal stone surgery (RIRS) procedure, ureteral access sheath (UAS) is still used in the majority of surgeries to both protect the flexible ureteroscope (FURS) and reduce intrarenal pressure. ClearPETRA is a new UAS that has an integrated aspiration port. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and effectiveness of Aspiration-Assisted UAS (ClearPETRA) in the RIRS procedure.

Methods

One thousand six hundred twenty patients who underwent RIRS between January 2021 and January 2024 were evaluated retrospectively and 512 patients were included in the study. According to stone size, patients with stones less than 2 cm and those with stones between 2 and 3 cm were analyzed separately. Patient's demographic data, stone size, body mass index, Extracoporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy (ESWL) history, stone side, stone density (Hounsfield Unit), operation time, stone-free rate (SFR), and the number of patients with sepsis were recorded. SFR was evaluated with kidney urinary bladder 3 months after surgery for opaque calculi. Nonopaque calculi patients were evaluated with noncontrast computed tomography 3 months after surgery. In the postoperative evaluation, patients with stones less than 4 mm were evaluated as SFR. P value of <0.01 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient's demographic data, stone characteristics, and history of ESWL were similar in the ClearPETRA and UAS groups (P > .05). A total of 328 patients who underwent RIRS for stones less than 2 cm were included (80 ClearPETRA, 248 UAS). Length of hospital stay, operation time, SFR, secondary intervention, or postoperative sepsis (P ≥ .01) were similar in both groups. The incidence of postoperative fever was statistically significantly lower in the ClearPETRA group (P = .006). A total of 184 patients who underwent RIRS for stones between 2 and 3 cm were included (42 ClearPETRA, 142 UAS). In the ClearPETRA group, operation time was statistically significantly shorter (P = .002), SFR was statistically significantly higher (P = .003), and the number of fever and sepsis were statistically significantly less (P = .003 and 0.002, respectively).

Conclusion

We found that ClearPETRA reduces the likelihood of postoperative fever after RIRS surgeries. Moreover, we can say that the use of ClearPETRA in RIRS, especially for stones larger than 2 cm, reduces the operation time, increases the SFR, and also reduces sepsis rates.