MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/icb.0000000000001522

Медицинская библиотека · Retinal cases & brief reports · 2025

BULLOUS VARIANT OF CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHY IN GOODPASTURE DISEASE: A CASE REPORT AND REVIEW OF LITERATURE.

Tsui Jonathan C, Carroll Robert M, Brucker Alexander J, Kolomeyer Anton M

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe a case of bullous variant of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSR) in Goodpasture disease (GD) compared with an identical twin without GD and summarize the literature on ocular manifestations of GD.

METHODS

This was an interventional/observational case report and literature review.

RESULTS

A 46-year-old White woman with a history of GD presented with decreased vision. She demonstrated bilateral multifocal pigment epithelial detachments and a large inferior exudative retinal detachment in the left eye consistent with bilateral CSR with bullous variant CSR in the left eye. Despite treatment, her disease remained refractory, with final VA of 20/200 in the left eye. The patient's identical twin sister did not have GD and demonstrated milder CSR on presentation with a more typical, self-limited disease course. Her final VA was 20/20 bilaterally.

CONCLUSION

Goodpasture disease is associated with severe manifestations of CSR (exudative retinal detachment). Additional studies focusing on the association between GD and CSR severity may be of interest.

Для цитирования: Tsui Jonathan C, Carroll Robert M, Brucker Alexander J, Kolomeyer Anton M. BULLOUS VARIANT OF CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHY IN GOODPASTURE DISEASE: A CASE REPORT AND REVIEW OF LITERATURE.. Retinal cases & brief reports. 2025. DOI: 10.1097/icb.0000000000001522.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.