International archives of allergy and immunology · 2010
Cross-reactivity in drug hypersensitivity reactions to sulfasalazine and sulfamethoxazole.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zawodniak Anna, Lochmatter Priska, Beeler Andreas, Pichler Werner J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Sulfonamides are generally classified into 2 groups: antibiotics and non-antibiotics. Recent studies showed that patients allergic to sulfonamide antibiotics do not have a specific risk for an allergy to sulfonamide non-antibiotic. However, the anti-inflammatory drug sulfasalazine represents an important exception. Used in rheumatic diseases, it is classified as a non-antibiotic sulfonamide, but is structurally related to antibiotic sulfonamides. Therefore, we aimed to analyze in vitro the cross-reactivity between the antimicrobial sulfamethoxazole and the anti-inflammatory drug sulfasalazine.
METHODS: PBMC from 2 patients with severe hypersensitivity syndrome to sulfasalazine, 3 patients with sulfamethoxazole allergy and 5 healthy donors were isolated and incubated with medium only (negative control), 2 concentrations (10, 100 μg/ml) of sulfapyridine, 2 concentrations (100, 200 μg/ml) of sulfamethoxazole, and tetanus toxoid (10 μg/ml) as a positive control. After 6 days of culture, (3)H-thymidine was added and cell proliferation was measured.
RESULTS: In all patients tested, the lymphocyte transformation tests were positive for both sulfapyridine and sulfamethoxazole, suggesting a strong cross-reactivity to these drugs. None of the healthy donors reacted to any of the drugs tested. We refrained from provoking our patients with either sulfasalazine or sulfamethoxazole, as they had a clear, typical history, severe symptoms and were positive on in vitro tests to both compounds.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that in the case of sulfamethoxazole and sulfasalazine, cross-reactivity is dependent on chemical features rather than the indication of the drugs. Therefore, patients with hypersensitivity to sulfasalazine or sulfamethoxazole should be specifically advised to avoid both drugs.
METHODS: PBMC from 2 patients with severe hypersensitivity syndrome to sulfasalazine, 3 patients with sulfamethoxazole allergy and 5 healthy donors were isolated and incubated with medium only (negative control), 2 concentrations (10, 100 μg/ml) of sulfapyridine, 2 concentrations (100, 200 μg/ml) of sulfamethoxazole, and tetanus toxoid (10 μg/ml) as a positive control. After 6 days of culture, (3)H-thymidine was added and cell proliferation was measured.
RESULTS: In all patients tested, the lymphocyte transformation tests were positive for both sulfapyridine and sulfamethoxazole, suggesting a strong cross-reactivity to these drugs. None of the healthy donors reacted to any of the drugs tested. We refrained from provoking our patients with either sulfasalazine or sulfamethoxazole, as they had a clear, typical history, severe symptoms and were positive on in vitro tests to both compounds.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that in the case of sulfamethoxazole and sulfasalazine, cross-reactivity is dependent on chemical features rather than the indication of the drugs. Therefore, patients with hypersensitivity to sulfasalazine or sulfamethoxazole should be specifically advised to avoid both drugs.