Journal of critical care · 2025
Evaluation of opioid requirements in mechanically ventilated patients taking buprenorphine/naloxone prior to admission.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
O'Connell Molly, Kamp Ashley, Mertz Sean, Kuhrt Michelle, Yang Lexie Zidanyue, Erkanli Alaattin, Cox Christopher E, Kram Bridgette
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: With limited data quantifying opioid requirements based on substance use history, including buprenorphine/naloxone use, optimal pain management for mechanically ventilated patients remains unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To compare opioid requirements in mechanically ventilated adults admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) taking buprenorphine/naloxone prior to admission compared to those who do not.
METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective study included adults admitted to a medical ICU and mechanically ventilated for at least 12 h. The primary endpoint was mean hourly opioid rate (fentanyl equivalents [FE], μg FE/h) from intubation until extubation or up to 72 h. Secondary endpoints included sedative requirements and time with pain and depth of sedation scores within goal. To adjust for confounders, a negative binomial model was performed.
RESULTS: Of 176 patients, 47 took buprenorphine/naloxone, 69 were opioid-naïve, and 60 were opioid-tolerant. There was no difference in mean hourly opioid rate between buprenorphine/naloxone (40.8 ± 37.1 μg FE/h) and opioid-naïve (31.7 ± 32.5 μg FE/h; p = 0.17) and opioid-tolerant patients (51 ± 46 μg FE/h; p = 0.22). Multivariable regression demonstrated similar hourly rates in buprenorphine/naloxone and opioid-naïve patients, but opioid-tolerant patients had 50 % higher rates (estimated rate ratio 1.5, 95 % CI [1.01, 2.23]). Time spent with pain scores at goal was similar. Time spent with sedation scores at goal was similar between buprenorphine/naloxone and opioid-naïve patients, but was lower than opioid-tolerant patients.
CONCLUSION: Patients taking buprenorphine/naloxone prior to admission who are mechanically ventilated for at least 12 h may have opioid requirements similar to opioid-naïve patients and lower than opioid-tolerant patients.
OBJECTIVE: To compare opioid requirements in mechanically ventilated adults admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) taking buprenorphine/naloxone prior to admission compared to those who do not.
METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective study included adults admitted to a medical ICU and mechanically ventilated for at least 12 h. The primary endpoint was mean hourly opioid rate (fentanyl equivalents [FE], μg FE/h) from intubation until extubation or up to 72 h. Secondary endpoints included sedative requirements and time with pain and depth of sedation scores within goal. To adjust for confounders, a negative binomial model was performed.
RESULTS: Of 176 patients, 47 took buprenorphine/naloxone, 69 were opioid-naïve, and 60 were opioid-tolerant. There was no difference in mean hourly opioid rate between buprenorphine/naloxone (40.8 ± 37.1 μg FE/h) and opioid-naïve (31.7 ± 32.5 μg FE/h; p = 0.17) and opioid-tolerant patients (51 ± 46 μg FE/h; p = 0.22). Multivariable regression demonstrated similar hourly rates in buprenorphine/naloxone and opioid-naïve patients, but opioid-tolerant patients had 50 % higher rates (estimated rate ratio 1.5, 95 % CI [1.01, 2.23]). Time spent with pain scores at goal was similar. Time spent with sedation scores at goal was similar between buprenorphine/naloxone and opioid-naïve patients, but was lower than opioid-tolerant patients.
CONCLUSION: Patients taking buprenorphine/naloxone prior to admission who are mechanically ventilated for at least 12 h may have opioid requirements similar to opioid-naïve patients and lower than opioid-tolerant patients.