MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Przeglad lekarski · 2013

[Hymenoptera venom allergy. Analysis of double sensitization to wasp and bee venom in own material--diagnosis and classification for immunotherapy].

Stobiecki Marcin, Dyga Wojciech, Czarnobilska Ewa

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

According to scientific societies guidelines the indication for venom immunotherapy is based on the clinical history of the patient. Diagnostic tests, like skin prick test or specific IgE serum estimation are conduct to prove IgE dependent mechanism of allergy and insect identification. Recent guidelines indicates for group of patients with severe systemic reactions as a candidates for diagnostic testing and in consequence for immunotherapy. In some countries diagnostic tests are also performed in patient who have a history of large local reactions, if they are considered as a candidates for immunotherapy. Double sensitization in cases of patients unable to identify the culprit insect is a diagnostic and therapeutic problem. In our group of patients (n = 113) we confirmed the double sensitization in 30% cases. The addition of a major allergen labeling reduced the number of people actually double-sensitized to 8.84%. It was observed that in patients who are not able to identify insect double sensitization phenomenon is particularly frequent as much as 45.5% and in the determination of the major allergens in 18.2%. Such patients needed detailed diagnosis and in many cases the use of two vaccines to conduct immunotherapy.

Для цитирования: Stobiecki Marcin, Dyga Wojciech, Czarnobilska Ewa. [Hymenoptera venom allergy. Analysis of double sensitization to wasp and bee venom in own material--diagnosis and classification for immunotherapy].. Przeglad lekarski. 2013.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.