Return to preinjury pivoting sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is different between males and females, as are the patient-reported reasons.

PURPOSE: To investigate return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), differences based on sex and concomitant meniscal repair, and identify reasons why patients do not RTS.

METHODS

Overall, 232 patients undergoing ACLR, with or without concomitant meniscal repair, that were actively participating in pivoting sports at the time of injury, were prospectively recruited. At 2 years, return to preinjury pivoting sport was investigated and, if they had returned, whether they felt their performance was at (or better) or below preinjury status. Specific reasons for not returning were identified. RTS rates and reasons for not returning were compared based on sex and meniscal repair.

RESULTS

Overall, 140 patients (60.3%) had returned to their preinjury pivoting sport, of which 98 (70.0%) felt they were performing at (or beyond) preinjury status. While a significantly greater (p = 0.024) percentage of males (66.9%) versus females (52.4%) had returned to pivoting sports by 2 years, no differences (p = 0.708) were seen based on concomitant meniscal repair. Overall, 92 patients (39.7%) had not RTS, with primary reasons being loss of interest (21.7%), too busy due to their work and/or family environment (22.8%), or fear of reinjury or lacking confidence (17.4%). Other less-reported reasons included ongoing knee issues (6.5%) or not feeling physically ready (5.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study outlined specific reasons why community-level patients do not RTS, with RTS status (and reasons for not returning to preinjury pivoting sports) differing between males and females, with the latter returning at a significantly lower rate overall.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.