CT angiography of the lower limbs: combining small field of view with large matrix size and iterative reconstruction further improves image quality of below-the-knee arteries.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Image quality and diagnostic accuracy in computed tomography angiography (CTA) reach their limits in imaging of below-the-knee vessels.
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether image quality in CTA of lower limbs is further improvable by combining side-separate reconstruction with a larger matrix size and whether resulting noise can be compromised with iterative reconstruction (IR).
MATERIAL AND
METHODS
From CTA of the lower extremities of 26 patients (5 women, 21 men; mean age = 68.5 ± 10.3 years), the lower legs were reconstructed side-separately with different reconstruction algorithms and matrix sizes including filtered back projection (FBP) with a 512 × 512 matrix, FBP with a 1024 × 1024 matrix, IR (SAFIRE) with a 512 × 512 matrix, and IR (SAFIRE) with a 1024 × 1024 matrix. A total of 208 CT series were evaluated. Subjective image quality was assessed by two readers using a 5-point Likert scale. Image noise was assessed by measuring signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios.
RESULTS
Subjective image quality was rated significantly higher when using a 1024 × 1024 matrix (P < 0.001) and could further be increased with IR. Vessel sharpness was rated significantly better with a larger matrix (P < 0.001). Visible and measured image noise was significantly higher with a 1024 × 1024 matrix but could be reduced by using IR (P < 0.001), even to a level below FBP with a 512 × 512 matrix while reconstructing with a larger matrix (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Image quality, image noise, and vessel sharpness can be further improved in CTA of the lower extremities with side-separate reconstruction using a 1024 × 1024 matrix size and IR.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.