DOI 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2026.102910
Association between pneumococcal vaccination and mortality risk in critically ill patients with acute myocardial infarction: A retrospective cohort study using a large clinical database.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Critically ill patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) carry a substantial mortality burden. Pneumococcal vaccination reduces the risk of invasive pneumococcal disease; however, the association between pneumococcal vaccination recorded during hospitalization and outcomes in critically ill patients with AMI remains unclear.
OBJECTIVES
To examine the association between in-hospital pneumococcal vaccination records and 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality after intensive care unit (ICU) admission.
METHODS
This retrospective cohort study used the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) version 3.1 database. Adult patients with AMI admitted to the ICU for the first time were included, excluding those with an ICU stay <24 h. Patients were classified as vaccinated or unvaccinated according to pneumococcal vaccination records during hospitalization. Time-dependent Cox models were applied, with sensitivity analyses, 6-hour landmark analysis, propensity score matching (PSM), subgroup analyses, and vaccine-type analyses.
RESULTS
Among 5638 patients, 1447 were vaccinated and 4191 were unvaccinated. In the fully adjusted model, pneumococcal vaccination was associated with lower 30-day mortality (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.58-0.83, P < 0.001) and 90-day mortality (HR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.65-0.86, P < 0.001). Sensitivity and PSM analyses yielded consistent results.
CONCLUSION
Pneumococcal vaccination recorded during hospitalization was associated with lower 30-day and 90-day mortality in critically ill patients with AMI. These exploratory findings require prospective validation.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.