Influence of diabetes on diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography of the calf arteries in acute limb ischemia.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have a more extensive distal arterial occlusive disease compared to non-diabetic patients. Diagnostic imaging is a necessity to identify the location and extent of the arterial occlusion in acute limb ischemia (ALI). Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is the most commonly used modality and the diagnostic performance with CTA of calf arteries may be questioned.
PURPOSE: To evaluate diagnostic performance of CTA of calf arteries in ALI and to compare patients with and without DM.
MATERIAL AND
METHODS
All thrombolytic treatments performed during 2001-2018 in patients with ALI were included. Initial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and CTA of all patients were classified according to the Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II) below-the-knee arteries and compared to CTA. Two raters assessed the CTA images independently. Inter-rater reliability was expressed as intraclass correlation (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
RESULTS
Patients with (n = 23) and without (n = 85) DM had lower (P = 0.006) glomerular filtration rate. ICC between CTA and DSA was 0.33 (95% CI -0.22 to 0.56) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.38-0.68) in patients with and without DM, respectively. Sensitivity with CTA for TASC D lesions in patients with and without DM was 0.14 (95% CI -0.12 to 0.40) and 0.64 (95% CI 0.48-0.80), respectively.
CONCLUSION
The sensitivity of CTA for assessment of infra-popliteal TASC D lesions in patients with ALI was not acceptable in patients with DM in contrast to those without DM. Another imaging option at present times should be considered for patients with DM.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.