Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2019
Does Unilateral Lower Limb Amputation Influence Ankle Joint Torque in the Intact Leg?
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Simoneau-Buessinger Émilie, Jakobi Jennifer M, Toumi Anis, Mathys Anne, Bassement Jennifer, Barbier Franck, Leteneur Sébastien
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To investigate ankle torque and steadiness in the intact leg of transtibial and transfemoral unilateral amputees.
DESIGN: Comparative study.
SETTING: Medical rehabilitation centers.
PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen persons with a unilateral transfemoral amputation, 8 persons with a transtibial amputation, and 14 able-bodied male participants volunteered to participate in this study (N=37).
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Maximal isometric torque performed during ankle plantarflexion and dorsiflexion in the intact limb of amputees and in the dominant limb of able-bodied persons. The coefficient of variation (CV) of the plantarflexion torque was calculated over 5 seconds during a submaximal isometric contraction (15%) in order to assess torque steadiness. Furthermore, electromyographic activity (the root mean square amplitude) of the gastrocnemius medialis and tibialis anterior muscles was analyzed.
RESULTS: Plantarflexion maximal torque was significantly higher for the able-bodied group (115±39 Nm) than for the group with a transfemoral amputation (77±34 Nm) (P<.01), and did not differ between able-bodied group and the group with a transtibial amputation (97±26 Nm) (P=.25). Furthermore, the transfemoral amputee group was 29% less steady than the able-bodied group (P=.01). However, there were no significant differences in torque steadiness between the able-bodied group and transtibial amputee group (P=.26) or between transtibial and transfemoral amputee groups (P=.27). The amputation had no significant effect between groups on dorsiflexion maximal torque (P=.10), gastrocnemius medialis electromyography (EMG) (P=.85), tibialis anterior coactivation (P=.95), and coactivation ratio (P=.75).
CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that as the level of amputation progresses from below the knee to above the knee, the effect on the intact ankle is progressively more negative.
DESIGN: Comparative study.
SETTING: Medical rehabilitation centers.
PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen persons with a unilateral transfemoral amputation, 8 persons with a transtibial amputation, and 14 able-bodied male participants volunteered to participate in this study (N=37).
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Maximal isometric torque performed during ankle plantarflexion and dorsiflexion in the intact limb of amputees and in the dominant limb of able-bodied persons. The coefficient of variation (CV) of the plantarflexion torque was calculated over 5 seconds during a submaximal isometric contraction (15%) in order to assess torque steadiness. Furthermore, electromyographic activity (the root mean square amplitude) of the gastrocnemius medialis and tibialis anterior muscles was analyzed.
RESULTS: Plantarflexion maximal torque was significantly higher for the able-bodied group (115±39 Nm) than for the group with a transfemoral amputation (77±34 Nm) (P<.01), and did not differ between able-bodied group and the group with a transtibial amputation (97±26 Nm) (P=.25). Furthermore, the transfemoral amputee group was 29% less steady than the able-bodied group (P=.01). However, there were no significant differences in torque steadiness between the able-bodied group and transtibial amputee group (P=.26) or between transtibial and transfemoral amputee groups (P=.27). The amputation had no significant effect between groups on dorsiflexion maximal torque (P=.10), gastrocnemius medialis electromyography (EMG) (P=.85), tibialis anterior coactivation (P=.95), and coactivation ratio (P=.75).
CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that as the level of amputation progresses from below the knee to above the knee, the effect on the intact ankle is progressively more negative.