Vascular and endovascular surgery · 2018
Impact of Tibial Runoff on Outcomes of Endovascular Treatment for Femoropopliteal Atherosclerotic Lesions.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Park Ui Jun, Kim Hyoung Tae, Roh Young-Nam
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of tibial runoff on outcomes of femoropopliteal interventions for atherosclerotic lesions.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 243 endovascular procedures for femoropopliteal atherosclerotic lesions on 243 limbs of 197 patients was performed.
RESULTS: The distribution rates of good tibial runoff (runoff score <7) and poor tibial runoff (runoff score ≥7) were 37.0% and 63.0%, respectively. In the poor tibial runoff group, the patients were older ( P = .019), and the proportion of male was lower ( P = .014). There was a significantly higher proportion of rest pain or tissue loss ( P < .001), and the prevalence of stroke ( P = .031) and renal insufficiency ( P = .005) was significantly higher in the poor runoff group. After femoropopliteal intervention, the amputation-free survival ( P = .03) and freedom from ischemia ( P = .003) were significantly lower in the poor runoff group. The interventions targeting below-the-knee (BTK) lesions performed concomitantly for critical limb ischemia or tissue loss with poor tibial runoff did not show a significant advantage in terms of freedom from ischemia; however, minor trends of longer lasting freedom from ischemia were observed when BTK intervention was combined.
CONCLUSION: The patients with poor runoff showed significantly lower amputation-free survival and freedom from ischemia. In poor tibial runoff limbs with critical limb ischemia or tissue loss, BTK intervention did not demonstrate additional significant beneficial outcomes; however, there was a minor trend of longer lasting freedom from ischemia after concomitant BTK intervention.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 243 endovascular procedures for femoropopliteal atherosclerotic lesions on 243 limbs of 197 patients was performed.
RESULTS: The distribution rates of good tibial runoff (runoff score <7) and poor tibial runoff (runoff score ≥7) were 37.0% and 63.0%, respectively. In the poor tibial runoff group, the patients were older ( P = .019), and the proportion of male was lower ( P = .014). There was a significantly higher proportion of rest pain or tissue loss ( P < .001), and the prevalence of stroke ( P = .031) and renal insufficiency ( P = .005) was significantly higher in the poor runoff group. After femoropopliteal intervention, the amputation-free survival ( P = .03) and freedom from ischemia ( P = .003) were significantly lower in the poor runoff group. The interventions targeting below-the-knee (BTK) lesions performed concomitantly for critical limb ischemia or tissue loss with poor tibial runoff did not show a significant advantage in terms of freedom from ischemia; however, minor trends of longer lasting freedom from ischemia were observed when BTK intervention was combined.
CONCLUSION: The patients with poor runoff showed significantly lower amputation-free survival and freedom from ischemia. In poor tibial runoff limbs with critical limb ischemia or tissue loss, BTK intervention did not demonstrate additional significant beneficial outcomes; however, there was a minor trend of longer lasting freedom from ischemia after concomitant BTK intervention.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmputation, SurgicalAngioplasty, BalloonAtherectomyCoated Materials, BiocompatibleDatabases, FactualDisease-Free SurvivalDrug-Eluting StentsFemaleFemoral ArteryHumansLimb SalvageMaleMiddle AgedPeripheral Arterial DiseasePlaque, AtheroscleroticPopliteal ArteryRegional Blood FlowRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTibial ArteriesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVascular Access DevicesVascular Patency