MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.06.004

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of vascular surgery · 2016

Lower extremity arterial revascularization using conditioned small-diameter great saphenous vein.

Fattoum Maher, Kennel Stefan, Knez Peter, Schmitz-Rixen Thomas, Khout Hazem, Tenholt Matthias H

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to determine whether it was feasible to increase the diameter of smaller great saphenous veins (GSVs) in preparation for possible bypass and whether such a conditioned conduit could be used with reasonable patency.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients (26 cases: 24 peripheral arterial occlusive disease, 2 popliteal aneurysms) with GSV diameters between 2 and 3 mm underwent in situ GSV valvulotomy and were observed for 3 months. After GSV dilation to >3 mm for below-knee revascularization and >3.5 mm for above-knee revascularization, arterial bypass surgery was performed with the valvulotomized GSV.

RESULTS

Adequate GSV diameter was reached in 20 cases (77%). Arterial bypass surgery using valvulotomized GSV was performed an average 131 days (range, 64-373 days) after valvulotomy in 16 patients (61.5%). No deaths, amputations, or aneurysms occurred 2 years after surgery. At 1 and 2 years, primary patency was 81% ± 9.8% and 69% ± 11.8%, respectively, and secondary patency was 87% ± 8.3% and 75% ± 11%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Valvulotomy can be used to expand small-diameter GSV for lower extremity arterial bypass.

Для цитирования: Fattoum Maher, Kennel Stefan, Knez Peter, Schmitz-Rixen Thomas, Khout Hazem, Tenholt Matthias H. Lower extremity arterial revascularization using conditioned small-diameter great saphenous vein.. Journal of vascular surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.06.004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.