MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.01.003

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of emergency medicine · 2009

Responding to suspected smallpox cases in the Los Angeles County from 2002 to 2006: identifying areas for education.

Kim Moon, Terashita Dawn, Borenstein Lee, Mascola Laurene

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Although smallpox has been eradicated, health care providers in emergency departments (EDs) need to remain vigilant to its recognition. Smallpox can be confused with chickenpox. We describe suspected smallpox cases reported in Los Angeles County from 2002 to 2006 and highlight areas for education.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed suspected smallpox reports from 2002 to 2006. Laboratory testing was performed. Photographs of rashes were taken.

RESULTS

Five suspected smallpox cases were reported. Two presented first to an ED. Smallpox was suspected based on rash features. Previous history of chickenpox or varicella vaccination may have caused increased suspicion for smallpox. All 5 were determined to have a final diagnosis of chickenpox. Health care providers notified public health appropriately and responses were immediate.

CONCLUSIONS

Public health investigated 5 suspected smallpox cases in the past 5 years. Two presented initially to EDs. Education differentiating smallpox from chickenpox and collaboration between public health, EDs, and health care providers remains important. The ability to respond rapidly to a potential bioterrorism emergency was tested.

Для цитирования: Kim Moon, Terashita Dawn, Borenstein Lee, Mascola Laurene. Responding to suspected smallpox cases in the Los Angeles County from 2002 to 2006: identifying areas for education.. The American journal of emergency medicine. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.01.003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.