MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.acra.2012.04.014

Медицинская библиотека · Academic radiology · 2012

Assessment of vascular contrast and depiction of stenoses in abdominopelvic and lower extremity vasculature: comparison of dual-energy MDCT with digital subtraction angiography.

Huang Steven Y, Nelson Rendon C, Miller Michael J, Kim Charles Y, Lawson Jeffrey H, Husarik Daniela B, Boll Daniel T

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

RATIONALE AND

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) angiography improves vascular contrast beyond MDCT angiography and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) while preserving the ability to precisely characterize stenoses, using DSA as reference standard.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

This prospective, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant, institutional review board-approved study was performed on 25 patients referred for lower extremity DECT angiography and subsequent DSA. Spectral data were postprocessed to create single-energy 120 kVp (MDCT series) and iodine-only (DECT series) datasets. The arterial tree was subdivided into 11 anatomical levels. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) and corresponding coefficient -of variation (CV) of patent vessel segments were evaluated for DECT, MDCT, and DSA using analysis of variance comparisons. Degree of stenoses was determined for DECT, MDCT, and DSA and correlated with t-test, bivariate Pearson comparisons, and Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS

Patent vasculature comprised 230 vessel segments. From infrarenal aorta to distal femoral arteries, DECT showed higher CNR compared to DSA and MDCT (P < .05); distal to the popliteal arteries, DSA achieved higher CNR (P < .05). Analyses of contrast homogeneity showed minimal CV above the knee for MDCT (≤9%) and for DSA below the knee (≤7%). Stenotic vasculature comprised 33 segments. Significant correlations of stenosis severity were found comparing DECT and MDCT with DSA as reference standard showing a 0.04-fold mean underestimation of stenoses on MDCT and no detectable mean variation on DECT compared with DSA.

CONCLUSION

DECT angiography improved contrast in vascular abdominopelvic and thigh distributions beyond MDCT angiography and DSA while preserving the ability to precisely assess severity of stenoses, using DSA as an accepted reference standard.

Для цитирования: Huang Steven Y, Nelson Rendon C, Miller Michael J, Kim Charles Y, Lawson Jeffrey H, Husarik Daniela B, Boll Daniel T. Assessment of vascular contrast and depiction of stenoses in abdominopelvic and lower extremity vasculature: comparison of dual-energy MDCT with digital subtraction angiography.. Academic radiology. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.04.014.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.