[Rational minimally invasive treatment of pAOD: when should a conservative approach, PTA, or stent be chosen?].

In order to obtain optimal results and satisfied patients, rational therapy of pAOD should strictly follow national and international society guidelines. In particular cases an individual therapeutic concept seems justified beyond these guidelines. Based on clinical data and driven by costs, aortic and iliac lesions may be treated by PTA or selective stent placement with equal results; however, long-term data justify also primary, direct stenting. For treatment of infrainguinal and popliteal stenotic lesions primary stenting should be restricted to PTA failure (dissection, recoil, occlusion); except for treatment of extended lesions, primary stenting compared to PTA alone seems beneficial in terms of midterm patency. Endovascular procedures below the knee and at the toe should be limited to existing limb-threatening ischemia in order to save the extremity; whether PTA or stenting is advantageous has not yet determined.