MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/000841749906600103

Медицинская библиотека · Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 1999

[Questionnaire on the satisfaction of persons with lower-limb amputations towards their prosthesis: development and validation].

Bilodeau S, Hébert R, Desrosiers J

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The satisfaction of persons with lower-limb amputations towards their prosthesis constitutes a critical factor in the use of the prosthesis. In order to evaluate a person's satisfaction, the SAT-PRO, a self-administrated questionnaire was developed. The questionnaire includes 15 items developed on the basis of the most significant criteria used by the person when selecting a technical aid. These criteria were measured using an ordinal categorical four-level scale. The validation of the SAT-PRO was established from a sample consisting of 61 people with below-knee or above-knee amputations, aging from 60 years and older. The internal consistency of the instrument is high (Cronback's alpha coefficient is 0.90) and the test-retest reliability coefficient (0.97) indicates a very good consistency of the questionnaire over time. Simple and multiple correlations were used to evaluate construct validity. The degree of use of the prosthesis and the feelings of depression, amongst the measured variables, are the best indicators of the satisfaction of the amputees toward their prosthesis.

Для цитирования: Bilodeau S, Hébert R, Desrosiers J. [Questionnaire on the satisfaction of persons with lower-limb amputations towards their prosthesis: development and validation].. Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie. 1999. DOI: 10.1177/000841749906600103.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.