MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/bf00311754

Медицинская библиотека · Surgery today · 1995

Benefits of arterial reconstruction in claudication.

Ohta T, Kato R, Sugimoto I, Hida K, Hachiya J, Mihara E, Hasegawa T, Imamura Y, Ishibashi H, Hosaka M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We conducted a midterm follow-up of 150 claudicants who underwent surgical reconstruction by assessing cumulative patency, survival, and palliation (graft patency in live patients) rates. Eighty-nine claudicants (group I) underwent direct (in situ) proximal revascularization, 33 (group II) had indirect (ex situ) proximal revascularization, while 28 (group III) had distal revascularization. The secondary patency rates at 3 years were 97.5% in group I, 97.0% in group II, and 75.0% in group III, respectively. Only one patient with limb graft thrombosis required below-knee amputation. There were 3 perioperative deaths (2 in group I and 1 in group II). The survival rates at 3 years were 86.0% in group I, 69.5% in group II, and 95.8% in group III, respectively. The palliation rates at 3 years were 84.8% in group I, 70.0% in group II, and 77.9% in group III, respectively. These findings indicate the midterm benefits of supra- and infrainguinal arterial reconstructions, and also suggest that the preoperative assessment of risks in individual patients, the selection of the appropriate operative procedure and graft material, and intensive postoperative follow-up and management of any associated disease are all important aspects in the treatment of claudicants.

Для цитирования: Ohta T, Kato R, Sugimoto I, Hida K, Hachiya J, Mihara E, Hasegawa T, Imamura Y, Ishibashi H, Hosaka M. Benefits of arterial reconstruction in claudication.. Surgery today. 1995. DOI: 10.1007/bf00311754.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.