MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00405-026-10599-w

Медицинская библиотека · European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026

Floor-reaching middle turbinate variants: Dual pathophysiology and descriptive terminology.

Erwe Ibrahem H, Alzahrani Mohammed A, Alzahrani Abdulbari A, Alamrai Bandar M, Alshahrani Khalid A, Alzarei Mohammad A, Alghamdi Ahmed M, Alyahya Yasir A, Alzarei Ali H

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The Bolger classification defines three concha bullosa types but does not account for extreme middle turbinate variants extending to the nasal floor. Only one prior report provided quantitative measurements (45mm). We present four patients (32-52mm vertical height) and distinguish primary pneumatization from secondary disease-filled expansion as the underlying mechanisms.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing endoscopic surgery from January 2021 to December 2024 at a tertiary rhinology center. Four patients with middle turbinate extension to within ≤3mm of the nasal floor underwent systematic evaluation including high-resolution CT with standardized measurements (vertical height, width, floor distance), endoscopic examination, histopathological analysis, and surgical management with one-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Four patients demonstrated massive middle turbinate extension with floor contact (32-52mm vertical height); three patients (48-52mm) exceeded the only previously quantified measurement (45mm) by 3-7mm (6.7-15.6%), while Patient 4 (32mm) qualified by floor distance criterion (≤3mm). Patients 1 and 4 represented extreme pneumatization (air-filled concha bullosa, 48mm and 32mm) without sinusitis. Patients 2 and 3 demonstrated secondary pathological expansion (allergic fungal rhinosinusitis 50mm, mucocele 52mm) with sinus involvement. Both mechanisms converged on a similar anatomical endpoint. All patients underwent endoscopic decompression using a systematic anterior-to-posterior technique, with disease-specific adjuncts (sinus clearance, mucocele drainage, frontal sinusotomy) added for Patients 2 and 3, achieving excellent outcomes in all four.

CONCLUSION

Floor-Reaching Middle Turbinate Variants represent a clinically significant pattern requiring recognition in radiological reporting and surgical planning. Because both mechanisms carry similar surgical implications, descriptive rather than classificatory terminology is warranted. Multicenter validation with standardized measurements is needed before formal classification.

Для цитирования: Erwe Ibrahem H, Alzahrani Mohammed A, Alzahrani Abdulbari A, Alamrai Bandar M, Alshahrani Khalid A, Alzarei Mohammad A, Alghamdi Ahmed M, Alyahya Yasir A, Alzarei Ali H. Floor-reaching middle turbinate variants: Dual pathophysiology and descriptive terminology.. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-026-10599-w.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.