MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1067/mva.1990.16917

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of vascular surgery · 1990

Utility of inframalleolar arterial bypass grafting.

Klamer T W, Lambert G E, Richardson J D, Banis J C, Garrison R N

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Sixty-five patients received 68 inframalleolar arterial grafts for severe rest pain, foot ulceration, or gangrene. Patients were elderly with an average age of 68 years (median 72); most had several operative risk factors. Reversed saphenous vein grafts were used early, but most conduits were in situ vein grafts. The recipient vessel was the dorsalis pedis artery in 39 patients, the posterior tibial in 27, and tarsal branches in two. Preoperative angiography was routinely performed with biplanar and digital arterial techniques, but in nearly a third a suitable bypass vessel was not identified preoperatively. When vessels were identified there was usually only a single patent artery suitable for bypass grafting below the knee. There were five postoperative deaths (7.6%). Eight grafts (11%) required early revision for thrombosis or retained valve, and six were salvaged and remained patent. Poor vein quality appeared responsible for the two early failures. Six late graft occlusions occurred from 4 to 39 months (mean 14 months). Three of these patients had no recurrence of their ulceration, but two required amputation, and one has continued rest pain. One additional amputation was required in a patient with a patent graft. Eleven late deaths (16%) occurred (nine with patent grafts) primarily of cardiac causes.

Для цитирования: Klamer T W, Lambert G E, Richardson J D, Banis J C, Garrison R N. Utility of inframalleolar arterial bypass grafting.. Journal of vascular surgery. 1990. DOI: 10.1067/mva.1990.16917.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.