What is the proper role of polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in infrainguinal reconstruction?

Polytetrafluoroethylene grafts have been used extensively for infrainguinal vascular reconstruction either as the conduit of choice or as a substitute when saphenous vein is unavailable. Although numerous studies have shown satisfactory early patency rates, the long-term efficacy of these grafts in a large number of patients for specific indications and in various positions has been less well defined. From 1977 to 1987 we used four PTFE grafts from three different manufacturers to perform 300 infrainguinal reconstructions on 240 patients on our vascular service. The indications for surgery were disabling claudication in 28% and limb salvage in 72%. The 30-day operative mortality of 1% was not different from the 1.4% associated with infrainguinal autogenous vein grafting. The 5-year cumulative patency rate achieved with all infrainguinal polytetrafluoroethylene grafts was 35%, significantly higher for grafts placed for claudication (57%) than those placed for limb salvage (24%). There were no significant differences between the above-knee and below-knee locations for distal anastomoses regardless of indication, but femoropopliteal grafts provided significantly higher 5-year patency (37%) than infrapopliteal grafts (12%). Comparison of the 5-year patency rates among the three manufacturers of polytetrafluoroethylene grafts showed no significant differences. Fifty-four polytetrafluoroethylene grafts that failed underwent 67 revisions after catheter thrombectomy or thrombolysis, which resulted in a minimal 11% 5-year patency rate. Based on this experience, it is concluded that infrainguinal polytetrafluoroethylene prostheses provide significantly inferior results when compared with autogenous reconstruction.