Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2026
Influence of Cochlear Microanatomy on Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Quinonez Del Cid Elena, Micuda Ashley, Dillon Margaret T, Lee Saangyoung E, Ladak Hanif M, Agrawal Sumit, Brown Kevin D
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Identify cochlear microanatomic variables that influence hearing preservation in adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review.
SETTING: Tertiary academic referral center.
PATIENTS: Forty-two CI recipients with preoperative unaided thresholds ≤45 dB HL at 250 Hz.
INTERVENTIONS: Cochlear implantation with a 24, 28, or 31.5-mm straight electrode array.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative and postoperative imaging were used to extract scala tympani (ST) volume, cochlear duct length (CDL), and cross-sectional measurements (height, width, area, and diameter), as well as angular insertion depth (AID) and cross-sectional measures at the most apical electrode (EA). Shift in low-frequency pure tone average (LFPTA; 125, 250, and 500 Hz) was computed at activation and at 6 months post activation.
RESULTS: A linear mixed-effects model analyzed the effects of cochlear microanatomy (ie, ST volume, CDL, and AID), cross-sectional measurements at EA (height, width, area, and diameter), as well as interval, age at surgery, and biological sex on the shift in LFPTA. Significant effects included biological sex (P = 0.01) and ST volume (P = 0.005). Age demonstrated a trend toward significance (P = 0.052). Interval (P = 0.26), CDL (P = 0.80), AID (P = 0.40), ST height (P = 0.71), ST width (P = 0.65), ST diameter (P = 0.56), and ST cross-sectional area (P = 0.14) did not significantly influence shift in LFPTA.
CONCLUSIONS: ST volume and biological sex are significantly predictive of hearing preservation for adult CI recipients. Hearing preservation may be more affected by overall ST volume than by interactions of the electrode with the local environment. Indirect mechanisms of trauma, such as hydraulic pressure as the electrode is inserted, may predominate in damage to intracochlear structures. Future studies are needed to validate these findings with measurement of intraoperative fluid pressure transients in relation to ST volume during array insertion.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review.
SETTING: Tertiary academic referral center.
PATIENTS: Forty-two CI recipients with preoperative unaided thresholds ≤45 dB HL at 250 Hz.
INTERVENTIONS: Cochlear implantation with a 24, 28, or 31.5-mm straight electrode array.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative and postoperative imaging were used to extract scala tympani (ST) volume, cochlear duct length (CDL), and cross-sectional measurements (height, width, area, and diameter), as well as angular insertion depth (AID) and cross-sectional measures at the most apical electrode (EA). Shift in low-frequency pure tone average (LFPTA; 125, 250, and 500 Hz) was computed at activation and at 6 months post activation.
RESULTS: A linear mixed-effects model analyzed the effects of cochlear microanatomy (ie, ST volume, CDL, and AID), cross-sectional measurements at EA (height, width, area, and diameter), as well as interval, age at surgery, and biological sex on the shift in LFPTA. Significant effects included biological sex (P = 0.01) and ST volume (P = 0.005). Age demonstrated a trend toward significance (P = 0.052). Interval (P = 0.26), CDL (P = 0.80), AID (P = 0.40), ST height (P = 0.71), ST width (P = 0.65), ST diameter (P = 0.56), and ST cross-sectional area (P = 0.14) did not significantly influence shift in LFPTA.
CONCLUSIONS: ST volume and biological sex are significantly predictive of hearing preservation for adult CI recipients. Hearing preservation may be more affected by overall ST volume than by interactions of the electrode with the local environment. Indirect mechanisms of trauma, such as hydraulic pressure as the electrode is inserted, may predominate in damage to intracochlear structures. Future studies are needed to validate these findings with measurement of intraoperative fluid pressure transients in relation to ST volume during array insertion.