MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0895-6111(98)00043-3

Медицинская библиотека · Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society · 1998

Computerized evaluation of mammographic image quality using phantom images.

Dougherty G

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A simple, quick and computerized method for quantitatively evaluating the image quality of mammography phantom images has been developed. Images of the American College of Radiology (ACR) mammographic accreditation phantoms were acquired under different X-ray techniques, scored and ranked subjectively by five expert readers, and digitized for quantitative analysis. The contrast and signal-to-noise (contrast-to-noise) ratios of the main nodule and microcalcification group were obtained accurately and reproducibly using an image processing protocol. The contrast values were successful at discriminating differences in image quality due to variations in scatter conditions (as a result of different kVp's, and the presence or absence of an acrylic scatterer and/or a moving Bucky grid). They were more precise, reproducible and sensitive than the ACR score. In particular, the contrast of the main nodule was highly correlated (r(s) = 0.988: p<0.001) with the ranking of image quality by our panel of expert readers.

Для цитирования: Dougherty G. Computerized evaluation of mammographic image quality using phantom images.. Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society. 1998. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-6111(98)00043-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.