MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fendo.2023.1206368

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023

Multiple myeloma following bone metastasis of renal cell carcinoma: a case report.

Yu Hong, Zhang Shengnan, Feng Xiaohui, Gao Feng

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The clinical manifestations of multiple myeloma (MM) and bone metastatic tumor are both systemic bone pain, which is difficult to distinguish from imaging manifestations, leading to misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis.

CASE SUMMARY: We reported a man with a unique case whose tumors were MM with bone metastatic tumor of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC). Computed tomography (CT) showed multifocal osteolytic bone destruction, while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed multifocal bone marrow infiltration with soft tissue mass. Pathology and immunohistochemistry established the diagnosis of the coexistence of myeloma with bone metastatic tumor of CCRCC in the spine. Immunotherapy and systemic chemotherapy were adopted in the clinic, and vertebral decompression was performed after anemia was corrected. This case with MM and bone metastatic tumor of CCRCC received radiotherapy and immunotherapy and acquired satisfying outcome after 1 year of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

It is difficult to differentiate MM and bone metastatic tumor on imaging, especially when there are bone lesions at the same time, which is an easily missed diagnosis and needs to be comprehensively evaluated in combination with functional procedures, clinical laboratory tests, and histopathology.

Для цитирования: Yu Hong, Zhang Shengnan, Feng Xiaohui, Gao Feng. Multiple myeloma following bone metastasis of renal cell carcinoma: a case report.. Frontiers in endocrinology. 2023. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1206368.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.