MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 2026

The Interval Pattern, Rather than High Intensity, Accounts for the Superior Effects of High-Intensity Interval Exercise (HIIE) on Glucose Tolerance.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Mora-Rodriguez Ricardo, Moreno-Cabañas Alfonso, Alvarez-Jimenez Laura, Mora-Gonzalez Diego, Guio de Prada Maria Del Valle, Morales-Palomo Felix

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Some data suggest that high-intensity interval exercise improves glycemic control more than continuous exercise. We aimed to identify the factor(s) that enhance insulin sensitivity during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) after exercise.

METHODS: Ten healthy, physically active individuals (including three females) completed three work-matched 50-minute exercise trials that differed in workload distribution. Using a randomized crossover design, participants completed: a) a moderate-intensity continuous exercise trial (MICE), b) a high-intensity interval exercise trial (HIIE), c) a high-intensity continuous exercise trial (HICE), and d) a no-exercise control trial (CONT). After exercise, insulin sensitivity (IS MATSUDA) was measured during the OGTT. Plasma glucose kinetics and oxidation rates were measured by infusion of isotopically labeled [U- 13C] glucose. Glycogen oxidation was calculated as the difference between total carbohydrate oxidation (assessed by indirect calorimetry) and plasma glucose oxidation.

RESULTS: Total carbohydrate oxidation, plasma glucose oxidation, calculated glycogen oxidation, and plasma lactate accumulation during exercise were similar between HIIE and HICE, and both were higher than during MICE (p<0.05). Only HIIE decreased the postprandial insulin area under the curve, which increased IS MATSUDA index above CONT, MICE and HICE (15.5±4.3 vs.12.7±4.4; 12.5±6.1 and 11.8±6.0; p = 0.048, 0.030, 0.005, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS: In summary, improvements in glycemic control following HIIE seem to be more related to its cyclic pattern than to glycogen use during the high-intensity segments. Our data suggest that exercise programs aimed at restoring glycemic control should emphasize workload cycling before engaging the high-intensity component.