Indian heart journal · 2024
Regional and socio-demographic variation in laboratory-based predictions of 10-year cardiovascular disease risk among adults in north and south India.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chaudhary Richard S, Srinivasapura Venkateshmurthy Nikhil, Dubey Manisha, Jarhyan Prashant, Prabhakaran Dorairaj, Mohan Sailesh
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in India. There is no laboratory-based CVD risk data among Indians from different regions and backgrounds. This study estimated laboratory-based 10-year CVD risk across different population sub-groups.
METHODS: Data from UDAY derived from cross-sectional surveys of rural and urban populations of northern (Haryana) and southern (Andhra Pradesh) India were analysed. World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension laboratory-based equations calculated 10-year CVD risk among participants without CVD history. Wilcoxon rank sum test analyzed average CVD risk across subgroups. Chi-square test compared population proportions in different CVD risk categories. Regression analysis assessed the association between CVD risk and participant characteristics.
RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of the participants (n = 8448) was 53.2 (9.2) years. Males in Haryana had increased CVD risk compared to those in Andhra Pradesh (p < 0.01). In both states, female gender was shown to have a protective effect on CVD risk (p < 0.01). Age correlated with increased risk (p < 0.01). Education level did not affect CVD risk however employment status may have. Hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, smoking, and insufficient exercise were associated with increased CVD risk (p < 0.01). Residence (urban versus rural) and wealth index did not largely affect CVD risk.
CONCLUSION: Minor differences exist in the distribution of laboratory-based CVD risk across Indian population cohorts. CVD risk was similar in urban wealthy participants and rural poor and working-class communities in northern and southern India. Public health efforts need to target all major segments of the Indian population to curb the CVD epidemic.
METHODS: Data from UDAY derived from cross-sectional surveys of rural and urban populations of northern (Haryana) and southern (Andhra Pradesh) India were analysed. World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension laboratory-based equations calculated 10-year CVD risk among participants without CVD history. Wilcoxon rank sum test analyzed average CVD risk across subgroups. Chi-square test compared population proportions in different CVD risk categories. Regression analysis assessed the association between CVD risk and participant characteristics.
RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of the participants (n = 8448) was 53.2 (9.2) years. Males in Haryana had increased CVD risk compared to those in Andhra Pradesh (p < 0.01). In both states, female gender was shown to have a protective effect on CVD risk (p < 0.01). Age correlated with increased risk (p < 0.01). Education level did not affect CVD risk however employment status may have. Hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, smoking, and insufficient exercise were associated with increased CVD risk (p < 0.01). Residence (urban versus rural) and wealth index did not largely affect CVD risk.
CONCLUSION: Minor differences exist in the distribution of laboratory-based CVD risk across Indian population cohorts. CVD risk was similar in urban wealthy participants and rural poor and working-class communities in northern and southern India. Public health efforts need to target all major segments of the Indian population to curb the CVD epidemic.