Appetite · 2026
Racial marginalization moderates associations between mothers' emotion regulation difficulties and feeding to soothe practices with young children.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Stein Sara F, Miller Alison L, Galano Maria M, Nuttall Amy K, Lonstein Joseph S, Bogat G Anne, Muzik Maria, Martinez-Torteya Cecilia, Levendosky Alytia A
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Early feeding practices such as feeding to soothe distress can shape children's self-regulation and eating behaviors. Maternal childhood maltreatment history and emotion regulation difficulties may contribute to greater reliance on feeding to soothe, though further evidence is needed. Furthermore, cultural differences in feeding may influence the association between emotion regulation and feeding to soothe. This study examined whether maternal trauma and emotion regulation difficulties predicted feeding to soothe and differences by racial marginalization group.
METHODS: Women (N = 181) were drawn from the Michigan Prenatal Stress Study. When children were 2.5 years, mothers reported on their history of childhood maltreatment, current feeding practices, emotion regulation difficulties, and demographics.
RESULTS: Racially marginalized women reported greater use of feeding to soothe than racially non-marginalized women. Emotion regulation difficulties and racial marginalization group predicted greater feeding to soothe use, whereas maltreatment was unrelated. Results of the interaction between emotion regulation difficulties and racial marginalization group revealed that among racially marginalized women, feeding to soothe did not significantly change based on emotion regulation difficulties. In contrast, racially non-marginalized women's use of feeding to soothe increased with increasing emotion regulation difficulties.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight that the mechanisms driving feeding to soothe may not be uniform across racial marginalization groups and underscore the importance of considering social, structural, and cultural context when examining child feeding practices. Culturally responsive interventions should account for these contextual factors rather than treating all mothers as a homogeneous group, and support emotion regulation particularly among racially non-marginalized women.
METHODS: Women (N = 181) were drawn from the Michigan Prenatal Stress Study. When children were 2.5 years, mothers reported on their history of childhood maltreatment, current feeding practices, emotion regulation difficulties, and demographics.
RESULTS: Racially marginalized women reported greater use of feeding to soothe than racially non-marginalized women. Emotion regulation difficulties and racial marginalization group predicted greater feeding to soothe use, whereas maltreatment was unrelated. Results of the interaction between emotion regulation difficulties and racial marginalization group revealed that among racially marginalized women, feeding to soothe did not significantly change based on emotion regulation difficulties. In contrast, racially non-marginalized women's use of feeding to soothe increased with increasing emotion regulation difficulties.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight that the mechanisms driving feeding to soothe may not be uniform across racial marginalization groups and underscore the importance of considering social, structural, and cultural context when examining child feeding practices. Culturally responsive interventions should account for these contextual factors rather than treating all mothers as a homogeneous group, and support emotion regulation particularly among racially non-marginalized women.