MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1524838015584363

Медицинская библиотека · Trauma, violence & abuse · 2015

Intimate Partner Violence in Self-Identified Lesbians: A Systematic Review of Its Prevalence and Correlates.

Badenes-Ribera Laura, Bonilla-Campos Amparo, Frias-Navarro Dolores, Pons-Salvador Gemma, Monterde-I-Bort Hector

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

This article presents the first systematic review on intimate partner violence (IPV) in self-identified lesbians in same-sex couples. Studies published from January 1990 to December 2013 were analyzed. Of the 687 studies reviewed, 59 were preselected, of which 14 studies were selected that met the inclusion and methodological quality criteria. A summary is presented of the characteristics of the studies, the participants, the prevalence of IPV victimization and perpetration, and its correlates. All the studies were carried out in the United States and used a nonprobabilistic sampling method. The majority of participants were White with a high educational level. The results indicate that all the forms of violence occur, but the most prevalent is emotional/psychological violence. The correlates positively associated with IPV are certain personality characteristics, fusion, previous IPV experience, a family history of violence, and alcohol consumption. This review finds significant limitations in the analyzed literature. Methodological recommendations are made for future studies.

Для цитирования: Badenes-Ribera Laura, Bonilla-Campos Amparo, Frias-Navarro Dolores, Pons-Salvador Gemma, Monterde-I-Bort Hector. Intimate Partner Violence in Self-Identified Lesbians: A Systematic Review of Its Prevalence and Correlates.. Trauma, violence & abuse. 2015. DOI: 10.1177/1524838015584363.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.