Anesthesia and pain medicine · 2026
Comparison of the recovery profiles of remimazolam-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanil in older patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgeries.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Seung Cheol, Chung Chan Jong, Ma Seok Hyun, Choi So Ron, Park Sang Yoong, Lee Tae Young
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We compared the quality of recovery (QoR) between total intravenous anesthesia using remimazolam and propofol in older patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgeries.
METHODS: A total of 120 patients (aged ≥ 60 years) undergoing laparoscopic gastric or colorectal surgery were randomized to the remimazolam or propofol group. Continuous remimazolam/propofol infusion and target-controlled remifentanil infusion were performed. Recovery was evaluated using the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15K) questionnaire. The primary outcome was the QoR-15K score on postoperative day (POD) 3. Secondary outcomes included the QoR-15K score on POD 1; perioperative mean arterial pressure and heart rate; times to eye opening, extubation, and full recovery; post-anesthetic care unit (PACU) adverse events; postoperative delirium; and duration of hospitalization.
RESULTS: The total QoR-15K scores over time did not make differences significantly between the groups. Total QoR-15K scores on POD 3 (112.0 [96.0, 119.0] vs. 104.0 [84.8, 120.5], P = 0.481) and POD 1 (80.0 [62.0, 97.0] vs. 78.0 [60.8, 95.3], P = 0.635) were comparable between the groups. The MAP and HR were significantly higher in the remimazolam group. The times to extubation (12.0 [11.0, 15.0] vs. 10.5 [9.0, 12.3] min, P = 0.003) and full recovery (13.0 [9.0, 16.0] vs. 11.5 [8.0, 14.0] min, P = 0.045) were notably longer in the remimazolam group. The incidence of adverse events in the PACU and postoperative delirium, and duration of hospitalization were comparable between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Remimazolam yielded a similar QoR as propofol in older patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgeries.
METHODS: A total of 120 patients (aged ≥ 60 years) undergoing laparoscopic gastric or colorectal surgery were randomized to the remimazolam or propofol group. Continuous remimazolam/propofol infusion and target-controlled remifentanil infusion were performed. Recovery was evaluated using the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15K) questionnaire. The primary outcome was the QoR-15K score on postoperative day (POD) 3. Secondary outcomes included the QoR-15K score on POD 1; perioperative mean arterial pressure and heart rate; times to eye opening, extubation, and full recovery; post-anesthetic care unit (PACU) adverse events; postoperative delirium; and duration of hospitalization.
RESULTS: The total QoR-15K scores over time did not make differences significantly between the groups. Total QoR-15K scores on POD 3 (112.0 [96.0, 119.0] vs. 104.0 [84.8, 120.5], P = 0.481) and POD 1 (80.0 [62.0, 97.0] vs. 78.0 [60.8, 95.3], P = 0.635) were comparable between the groups. The MAP and HR were significantly higher in the remimazolam group. The times to extubation (12.0 [11.0, 15.0] vs. 10.5 [9.0, 12.3] min, P = 0.003) and full recovery (13.0 [9.0, 16.0] vs. 11.5 [8.0, 14.0] min, P = 0.045) were notably longer in the remimazolam group. The incidence of adverse events in the PACU and postoperative delirium, and duration of hospitalization were comparable between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Remimazolam yielded a similar QoR as propofol in older patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgeries.