Journal of intensive care medicine · 2026
Effects of Platelet Transfusion on Sepsis Associated Thrombocytopenia (SAT): A Multicenter Retrospective Chart Review.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Lu, Pan Wei, Du Bin, Zhou Xiang, China National Critical Care Quality Control Centre Group (China-NCCQC) and China Critical Care Clinical Trials Group (CCCCTG)
Аннотация
ObjectiveTo investigate effects of platelet transfusion on sepsis associated thrombocytopenia (SAT).MethodsIn this study, 695 SAT patients admitted to Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) were enrolled from June 8, 2013 to October 12, 2022. Externally validate was carried out using 2739 SAT patients in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether platelet transfusion was administered.ResultsAfter propensity score-matching, compared with the control group, the platelet transfusion group had longer mechanical ventilation time (43 vs 169 h, P < 0.05), more expenses (122.29 vs 254.03 thousand yuan [RMB], P < 0.05), longer hospital stays (536 vs 817 h, P < 0.05), longer hospital stays after diagnosis of SAT (384 vs 636 h, P < 0.05), longer ICU stays (133 vs 227 h, P < 0.05), higher mortality (30.1 vs 53.4%, P < 0.05). Effective platelet transfusion rate was 52.51%. Subgroup analysis based on the degree of thrombocytopenia and data analysis from MIMIC-IV further confirmed above results. Contrary to intuition, as the platelet count decreased, the effective platelet transfusion rate tended to decrease. Positive rate of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was 18.85% in SAT in PUMCH. Compared with the control group, the platelet transfusion group had higher positive rate of DVT (27 / 131 vs 33 / 92, P < 0.05) in subgroup with platelet count [50, 100 × 109/L) in PUMCH.ConclusionsNo benefits from platelet transfusion were observed in SAT. Around 50% of platelet transfusions in SAT were platelet transfusion refractoriness. Platelet transfusion was associated with higher positive rate of DVT in SAT patients with platelet count [50, 100 × 109/L).