MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/bsl.473

Медицинская библиотека · Behavioral sciences & the law · 2002

Death row inmate characteristics, adjustment, and confinement: a critical review of the literature.

Cunningham Mark D, Vigen Mark P

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

This article reviews and summarizes research on death row inmates. The contributions and weaknesses of death row demographic data, clinical studies, and research based on institutional records are critiqued. Our analysis shows that death row inmates are overwhelmingly male and disproportionately Southern. Racial representation remains controversial. Frequently death row inmates are intellectually limited and academically deficient. Histories of significant neurological insult are common, as are developmental histories of trauma, family disruption, and substance abuse. Rates of psychological disorder among death row inmates are high, with conditions of confinement appearing to precipitate or aggravate these disorders. Contrary to expectation, the extant research indicates that the majority of death row inmates do not exhibit violence in prison even in more open institutional settings. These findings have implications for forensic mental health sentencing evaluations, competent attorney representation, provision of mental health services, racial disparity in death sentences, death row security and confinement policies, and moral culpability considerations. Future research directions on death row populations are suggested.

Для цитирования: Cunningham Mark D, Vigen Mark P. Death row inmate characteristics, adjustment, and confinement: a critical review of the literature.. Behavioral sciences & the law. 2002. DOI: 10.1002/bsl.473.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.