Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine · 2022
Sports injury prevention programmes from the sports physical therapist's perspective: An international expert Delphi approach.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mendonça Luciana De Michelis, Schuermans Joke, Denolf Sander, Napier Christopher, Bittencourt Natália F N, Romanuk Andrés, Tak Igor, Thorborg Kristian, Bizzini Mario, Ramponi Carlo, Paterson Colin, Hägglund Martin, Malisoux Laurent, Al Attar Wesam Saleh A, Samukawa Mina, Esteve Ernest, Bakare Ummkulthoum, Constantinou Maria, Schneiders Anthony, Cavallieri Gomes Alexandre, Florentz Didier, Ozer Kaya Derya, Indra Lesmana Syahmirza, Harøy Joar, Kuparinen Vesa, Philips Nicola, Jenkins Walter, Wezenbeek Evi, Witvrouw Erik
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To provide consensus on how to plan, organize and implement exercise-based injury prevention program (IPP) in sports.
DESIGN: Delphi.
SETTING: LimeSurvey platform.
PARTICIPANTS: Experienced sports physical therapists from the International Federation of Sports Physical Therapy member countries.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Factors related to sports IPP planning, organization and implementation.
RESULTS: We included 305 participants from 32 countries. IPP planning should be based on an athlete's injury history, on pre-season screening results, and on injury rates (respectively, 98%, 92%, 89% agreement). In total 97% participants agreed that IPP organization should depend on the athlete's age, 93% on the competition level, and 93% on the availability of low-cost materials. It was agreed that IPP should mainly be implemented in warm-up sessions delivered by the head or strength/conditioning coach, with physical training sessions and individual physical therapy sessions (respectively, 94%, 92%, 90% agreement).
CONCLUSION: Strong consensus was reached on (1) IPP based on the athlete's injury history, pre-season screening and evidence-based sports-specific injury rates; (2) IPP organization based on the athlete's age, competition level, and the availability of low-cost materials and (3) IPP implementation focussing on warm-up sessions implemented by the strength/conditioning coach, and/or individual prevention sessions by the physical therapist.
DESIGN: Delphi.
SETTING: LimeSurvey platform.
PARTICIPANTS: Experienced sports physical therapists from the International Federation of Sports Physical Therapy member countries.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Factors related to sports IPP planning, organization and implementation.
RESULTS: We included 305 participants from 32 countries. IPP planning should be based on an athlete's injury history, on pre-season screening results, and on injury rates (respectively, 98%, 92%, 89% agreement). In total 97% participants agreed that IPP organization should depend on the athlete's age, 93% on the competition level, and 93% on the availability of low-cost materials. It was agreed that IPP should mainly be implemented in warm-up sessions delivered by the head or strength/conditioning coach, with physical training sessions and individual physical therapy sessions (respectively, 94%, 92%, 90% agreement).
CONCLUSION: Strong consensus was reached on (1) IPP based on the athlete's injury history, pre-season screening and evidence-based sports-specific injury rates; (2) IPP organization based on the athlete's age, competition level, and the availability of low-cost materials and (3) IPP implementation focussing on warm-up sessions implemented by the strength/conditioning coach, and/or individual prevention sessions by the physical therapist.