Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980) · 2026
Bedside trans-burr hole dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) and ultrasound localization microscopy (ULM) in relapsed glioblastoma - a retrospective comparative case series.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Falter Johannes, Jung Ernst Michael, Grieshaber-Bouyer Mandelbaum Henriette, Wachter Felix, Gludowatz Johannes, Anthofer Judith, Koskimäki Janne, Knieling Ferdinand, Regensburger Adrian Philip, Proescholdt Martin, Schmidt Nils Ole
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Although contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and dynamic CEUS (DCE-US) are well established in other oncologic entities, their use in neuro-oncology has been limited by the acoustic inaccessibility of the brain through the intact skull. This study investigates the feasibility of the use of DCE-US and ultrasound localization microscopy (ULM) in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), by utilizing the craniotomy burr hole as an acoustic window.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: CEUS data from n=8 patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed GBM were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent CEUS via the craniotomy burr hole in the bedside setting, and perfusion analysis was conducted on stored cine loops. DCE-US parameters - time-to-peak (TTP), area under the curve (AUC), wash-in AUC, and washout AUC - were analyzed in three region-of-interest (ROI) zones: tumor center, margin, and adjacent normal brain. Next, ULM algorithms were applied to multiple frames to reconstruct the GBM tumor microvasculature.
RESULTS: Trans-burr hole imaging was feasible in all patients. Differences in TTP, AUC, washout AUC, and signal gradient were observed between the lesion center and both the margin and normal brain tissue, while the margin and the normal brain did not differ. Lesion-center AUC values were significantly higher in confirmed tumor recurrence (n=4) than in reactive gliosis (n=2). Recurrent tumors showed homogeneous, well-defined enhancement, whereas non-tumorous lesions appeared heterogeneous and ill-defined. ULM enabled quantification and visualization of directivity, velocity, and density maps corresponding to tumor anatomy and microbubble dynamics.
CONCLUSION: DCE-US and ULM via the post-surgical burr hole offer a promising, noninvasive tool for perfusion assessment and relapse evaluation in GBM follow-up.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: CEUS data from n=8 patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed GBM were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent CEUS via the craniotomy burr hole in the bedside setting, and perfusion analysis was conducted on stored cine loops. DCE-US parameters - time-to-peak (TTP), area under the curve (AUC), wash-in AUC, and washout AUC - were analyzed in three region-of-interest (ROI) zones: tumor center, margin, and adjacent normal brain. Next, ULM algorithms were applied to multiple frames to reconstruct the GBM tumor microvasculature.
RESULTS: Trans-burr hole imaging was feasible in all patients. Differences in TTP, AUC, washout AUC, and signal gradient were observed between the lesion center and both the margin and normal brain tissue, while the margin and the normal brain did not differ. Lesion-center AUC values were significantly higher in confirmed tumor recurrence (n=4) than in reactive gliosis (n=2). Recurrent tumors showed homogeneous, well-defined enhancement, whereas non-tumorous lesions appeared heterogeneous and ill-defined. ULM enabled quantification and visualization of directivity, velocity, and density maps corresponding to tumor anatomy and microbubble dynamics.
CONCLUSION: DCE-US and ULM via the post-surgical burr hole offer a promising, noninvasive tool for perfusion assessment and relapse evaluation in GBM follow-up.