MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/jom.0000000000000916

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2017

Quality of Care for Work-Associated Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Nuckols Teryl, Conlon Craig, Robbins Michael, Dworsky Michael, Lai Julie, Roth Carol P, Levitan Barbara, Seabury Seth, Seelam Rachana, Asch Steven M

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the quality of care provided to individuals with workers' compensation claims related to Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and identify patient characteristics associated with receiving better care.

METHODS

We recruited subjects with new claims for CTS from 30 occupational clinics affiliated with Kaiser Permanente Northern California. We applied 45 process-oriented quality measures to 477 subjects' medical records, and performed multivariate logistic regression to identify patient characteristics associated with quality.

RESULTS

Overall, 81.6% of care adhered to recommended standards. Certain tasks related to assessing and managing activity were underused. Patients with classic/probable Katz diagrams, positive electrodiagnostic tests, and higher incomes received better care. However, age, sex, and race/ethnicity were not associated with quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Care processes for work-associated CTS frequently adhered to quality measures. Clinical factors were more strongly associated with quality than demographic and socioeconomic ones.

Для цитирования: Nuckols Teryl, Conlon Craig, Robbins Michael, Dworsky Michael, Lai Julie, Roth Carol P, Levitan Barbara, Seabury Seth, Seelam Rachana, Asch Steven M. Quality of Care for Work-Associated Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine. 2017. DOI: 10.1097/jom.0000000000000916.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.