MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf165

Медицинская библиотека · BJS open · 2025

Comparative outcomes of arteriovenous fistulas and grafts in haemodialysis: meta-analysis with subgroup analysis by fistula type and transposition status.

Yang Chiehlun, Yang Wenhsing, Xiao Leijuan, Zhu Runzhang, Li Xiaofeng, Xiang Erqing, Wang Hongying, Lou Jizhuang, Gao Zhanhui

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорСравнительное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are preferred over arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) for haemodialysis, but effectiveness may vary by fistula subtype, access site, and transposition.

METHODS

In this systematic review, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and CENTRAL were searched up to 11 January 2025 for comparative studies of AVF versus AVG in adults. Random-effects meta-analyses pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals, standardized to 1-year outcomes (2-year effects summarized secondarily). Prespecified subgroups were AVF site (forearm versus upper arm), AVG site (forearm, upper arm, lower limb), AVF type (radiocephalic, brachiocephalic, brachiobasilic, basilic, brachial-brachial), and transposition. Observational studies were appraised with the National Institute of Health tool; randomized clinical trials with RoB 2. Meta-regression evaluated age, diabetes, and hypertension; certainty was appraised with GRADE.

RESULTS

Sixty-three studies (357 333 patients: 226 078 AVF; 131 255 AVG) were included. At 1 year, AVF was associated with higher primary (OR = 1.61, 95% confidence interval 1.19 to 2.18), primary-assisted (OR = 1.69, 1.46 to 1.96), and secondary patency (OR = 1.69, 1.18 to 2.44), and lower overall complications (OR = 0.52, 0.34 to 0.78) and mortality (OR = 0.57, 0.34 to 0.98) versus AVG; primary failure and revision did not differ. Benefits were marked for transposed AVFs (primary-assisted OR = 2.07, 1.45 to 2.95; complications OR = 0.62, 0.43 to 0.88) and for upper-arm AVFs in primary patency (OR = 1.56, 1.05 to 2.31). Basilic AVF improved secondary patency (OR = 2.31, 1.17 to 4.57). Infection and thrombosis risks were lower for basilic and brachiobasilic AVF and upper-arm AVF. Meta-regression suggested diabetes modified effects (better secondary patency; fewer revisions), whereas age and hypertension did not. Certainty was generally low to moderate.

CONCLUSION

When standardized at 1 year, AVFs outperform AVGs for patency, complications, and mortality, with magnitude varying by site, transposition, and fistula type. Findings support individualized access planning and the role of transposed upper-arm AVFs when feasible.

REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420251125422 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/home).

Для цитирования: Yang Chiehlun, Yang Wenhsing, Xiao Leijuan, Zhu Runzhang, Li Xiaofeng, Xiang Erqing, Wang Hongying, Lou Jizhuang, Gao Zhanhui. Comparative outcomes of arteriovenous fistulas and grafts in haemodialysis: meta-analysis with subgroup analysis by fistula type and transposition status.. BJS open. 2025. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf165.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.