Kidney medicine · 2025
Depression and Advance Care Planning Among Japanese Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis: Japanese Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Pattern Study (J-DOPPS).
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nishiwaki Hiroki, Miyakoshi Chisato, Miyashita Jun, Onishi Yoshihiro, Kurita Noriaki, Komaba Hirotaka, Sakai Ken
Аннотация
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Advance care planning (ACP) is crucial in end-of-life care. Data on ACP discussion among patients with end-stage kidney disease are limited. One study has suggested that depressive symptoms increase ACP discussion.
STUDY DESIGN: This study aimed to analyze the association between depression and ACP discussion in patients undergoing hemodialysis.
SETTING & POPULATION: This used data from the Japan Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study.
PREDICTOR: Both cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between depressive symptoms and ACP discussion were examined.
OUTCOMES: Depressive symptoms were defined as a score of ≥10 points on the 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale. ACP discussion was defined as discussing ACP with health care providers and family members.
ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Generalized estimating equations and generalized linear models based on Poisson distribution and log-link function were used to estimate prevalence (PR) and incidence proportion ratios (IPRs) using robust standard errors, respectively.
RESULTS: Data in 2016 and 2017 included 2,443 patients for the cross-sectional analysis and 870 for the longitudinal analysis. ACP discussion was 26% in 2016 and 28% in 2017, with depressive symptoms rates of 45% and 47%, respectively. The cross-sectional analysis indicated a positive association between depressive symptoms and ACP discussion (adjusted PR, 1.20; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05-1.37). Depressive symptoms were not significantly associated with ACP discussion in longitudinal analyses (adjusted IPR, 1.10; 95% CI 0.80-1.51).
LIMITATIONS: Sample size, unadjusted confounding, and generalizability across cultural backgrounds.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed an association between depressive symptoms and ACP in the cross-sectional analysis, but not longitudinally.
STUDY DESIGN: This study aimed to analyze the association between depression and ACP discussion in patients undergoing hemodialysis.
SETTING & POPULATION: This used data from the Japan Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study.
PREDICTOR: Both cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between depressive symptoms and ACP discussion were examined.
OUTCOMES: Depressive symptoms were defined as a score of ≥10 points on the 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale. ACP discussion was defined as discussing ACP with health care providers and family members.
ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Generalized estimating equations and generalized linear models based on Poisson distribution and log-link function were used to estimate prevalence (PR) and incidence proportion ratios (IPRs) using robust standard errors, respectively.
RESULTS: Data in 2016 and 2017 included 2,443 patients for the cross-sectional analysis and 870 for the longitudinal analysis. ACP discussion was 26% in 2016 and 28% in 2017, with depressive symptoms rates of 45% and 47%, respectively. The cross-sectional analysis indicated a positive association between depressive symptoms and ACP discussion (adjusted PR, 1.20; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05-1.37). Depressive symptoms were not significantly associated with ACP discussion in longitudinal analyses (adjusted IPR, 1.10; 95% CI 0.80-1.51).
LIMITATIONS: Sample size, unadjusted confounding, and generalizability across cultural backgrounds.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed an association between depressive symptoms and ACP in the cross-sectional analysis, but not longitudinally.