MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1128/jcm.43.9.4602-4606.2005

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical microbiology · 2005

Comparison of methods for detection of vaccinia virus in patient specimens.

Fedorko Daniel P, Preuss Jeanne C, Fahle Gary A, Li Li, Fischer Steven H, Hohman Patricia, Cohen Jeffrey I

Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We analyzed a shell vial culture assay (SVA), real-time PCR, and a direct fluorescent antibody assay (DFA) for rapid detection of vaccinia virus from vaccination sites of Dryvax vaccine recipients. Of 47 samples assayed, 100% were positive by PCR, 89% were positive by SVA, and 40% were positive by DFA. DFA was limited by the need for adequate numbers of cells, with 32% of samples inadequate for interpretation. DFA performed better with specimens from patients who had not previously received the vaccine. PCR was positive for longer times postvaccination than was SVA. Infectious virus could be recovered after 45 min of acetone fixation of shell vial coverslips. Commercially available polyclonal antibodies cross-reacted with other orthopoxviruses and herpes simplex 1, but commercially available monoclonal antibodies were specific for vaccinia virus. In summary, PCR was the most sensitive test for detecting vaccinia virus in clinical specimens, while the DFA was the most rapid but the least sensitive test.

Для цитирования: Fedorko Daniel P, Preuss Jeanne C, Fahle Gary A, Li Li, Fischer Steven H, Hohman Patricia, Cohen Jeffrey I. Comparison of methods for detection of vaccinia virus in patient specimens.. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2005. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.43.9.4602-4606.2005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.