MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.64898/2026.04.16.719115

Медицинская библиотека · bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026

Systematic evaluation of 24 extraction and library preparation combinations for metagenomic sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva.

Qian Kenin, Abhyankar Varada, Keo Dahlia, Zarceno Payton, Toy Traci, Eskin Eleazar, Arboleda Valerie A

СтатьяПрепринтПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Sequencing the respiratory tract transcriptome has the potential to provide insights into infectious pathogens and the host's immune response. While DNA-based sequencing is more standard in clinical laboratories due to its stability, RNA assays offer unique advantages. RNA reflects dynamic physiological changes, and for RNA viruses, viral RNA particles directly represent copies of the viral genome, enabling greater diagnostic sensitivity. However, RNA's susceptibility to degradation remains a significant challenge, particularly in RNase-rich specimens like saliva. To address this, we conducted a systematic, combinatorial evaluation of 24 distinct mNGS workflows, crossing eight nucleic acid extraction methods with three RNA-Seq library preparation protocols. Remnant saliva samples (n = 6) were pooled and spiked with MS2 phage as a control. The SARS-CoV-2 virus was spiked into half of the samples, which were extracted using the eight different extraction methods (n = 3) and compared using RNA Integrity Number equivalent (RINe) scores and RNA concentration. The extracted RNA was then processed across the three library construction methods and subjected to short-read sequencing to assess all 24 combinations head-to-head. We compared methods based on viral read recovery and found that RINe and concentration did not correlate with viral detection. The Zymo Quick-RNA Magbead kit and the Tecan Revelo RNA-Seq High-Sensitivity RNA library kit were the extraction and library-preparation kits that yielded the most SARS-CoV-2 reads, respectively. Importantly, our combinatorial analysis revealed that any small variability attributable to different nucleic acid extraction methods was heavily overshadowed by differences in quality attributable to the RNA-Seq library preparation methods. These findings challenge the reliance on conventional RNA quality metrics for clinical metagenomics and underscore the need to redefine extraction quality standards for mNGS applications.

Для цитирования: Qian Kenin, Abhyankar Varada, Keo Dahlia, Zarceno Payton, Toy Traci, Eskin Eleazar, Arboleda Valerie A. Systematic evaluation of 24 extraction and library preparation combinations for metagenomic sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva.. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology. 2026. DOI: 10.64898/2026.04.16.719115.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.