Journal of translational medicine · 2026
Lineage-specific immune checkpoint dynamics define a context-dependent regulatory framework with translational relevance in human γδ T cells.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Corsale Anna Maria, Di Simone Marta, Cerapio Juan Pablo, Lo Presti Elena, Pizzolato Gabriele, Avellone Claudia, Dieli Costanza, Marchiafava Salvatore, Di Paola Laura, Dieli Francesco, Meraviglia Serena
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint receptors (ICRs) are widely used as markers of T-cell exhaustion, yet their interpretation remains context-dependent and is poorly described in γδ T cells. Here, we investigated the dynamics, functional impact, and differentiation-associated distribution of ICRs across human γδ and αβ T-cell subsets.
METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy donors were stimulated in vitro to assess ICR dynamics in γδ and αβ T-cell subsets by flow cytometry. Functional effects of PD-1 and TIM-3 blockade were evaluated through proliferation, cytokine production, and degranulation assays. In parallel, previously published single-cell RNA-sequencing datasets of tumor-infiltrating γδ and CD8 T cells were subjected to secondary bioinformatic analysis to characterize differentiation-associated ICR expression patterns and their modulation following immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy.
RESULTS: ICR expression was regulated in a receptor-, lineage- and context-dependent manner. Polyclonal stimulation induced broad ICR upregulation, whereas phosphoantigen-driven Vδ2 T cell expansion resulted in a selective profile with sustained TIM-3 expression and transient modulation of PD-1 and TIGIT. Checkpoint distribution was structured across differentiation states, with TIGIT enriched in antigen-experienced subsets, LAG-3 and TIM-3 in naive compartments, and PD-1 broadly expressed. PD-1 blockade was associated with donor-dependent trends toward increased proliferation and cytokine production, particularly under IL-15 stimulation, whereas TIM-3 inhibition showed variable effects and combined blockade did not produce a consistent additive response. Single-cell transcriptomic analyses revealed that tumor-infiltrating γδ T cells displayed heterogeneous ICR expression across differentiation states, whereas CD8 T cells showed a more progressive pattern of checkpoint expression. Because classical exhaustion-associated transcriptional and epigenetic programs were not evaluated, these patterns neither establish nor exclude the presence of exhausted γδ T-cell subsets. ICB therapy was associated with persistence or upregulation of alternative checkpoints.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that ICR expression in γδ T cells is dynamically shaped by activation, differentiation, and environmental context. However, ICR expression alone is insufficient to define or exclude a state of T-cell exhaustion.
METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy donors were stimulated in vitro to assess ICR dynamics in γδ and αβ T-cell subsets by flow cytometry. Functional effects of PD-1 and TIM-3 blockade were evaluated through proliferation, cytokine production, and degranulation assays. In parallel, previously published single-cell RNA-sequencing datasets of tumor-infiltrating γδ and CD8 T cells were subjected to secondary bioinformatic analysis to characterize differentiation-associated ICR expression patterns and their modulation following immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy.
RESULTS: ICR expression was regulated in a receptor-, lineage- and context-dependent manner. Polyclonal stimulation induced broad ICR upregulation, whereas phosphoantigen-driven Vδ2 T cell expansion resulted in a selective profile with sustained TIM-3 expression and transient modulation of PD-1 and TIGIT. Checkpoint distribution was structured across differentiation states, with TIGIT enriched in antigen-experienced subsets, LAG-3 and TIM-3 in naive compartments, and PD-1 broadly expressed. PD-1 blockade was associated with donor-dependent trends toward increased proliferation and cytokine production, particularly under IL-15 stimulation, whereas TIM-3 inhibition showed variable effects and combined blockade did not produce a consistent additive response. Single-cell transcriptomic analyses revealed that tumor-infiltrating γδ T cells displayed heterogeneous ICR expression across differentiation states, whereas CD8 T cells showed a more progressive pattern of checkpoint expression. Because classical exhaustion-associated transcriptional and epigenetic programs were not evaluated, these patterns neither establish nor exclude the presence of exhausted γδ T-cell subsets. ICB therapy was associated with persistence or upregulation of alternative checkpoints.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that ICR expression in γδ T cells is dynamically shaped by activation, differentiation, and environmental context. However, ICR expression alone is insufficient to define or exclude a state of T-cell exhaustion.